Blue Header Kult Grete Thunberg

Čas branja 73 minut

Vsebina


RTV Slovenija/MMC in National Endowment for Democracy

V Sloveniji je odličen primer rednega pranja možganov in manipuliranja preko Rockefellerjevih fundacij, National Endowment for Democracy, Open Society Foundations in ostalih organizacij ”liberalne CIA” ”javni” RTV Slovenija/MMC, ki preko vodilnih ”novinarjev”, deluje kot sredstvo ”liberalne CIA”. In zaradi te vloge deluje RTV/MMC kot ”nasprotnik” od National Endowment for Democracy, in ga prikazuje predvsem kot (neo)konservatino organizacijo, ki je del Republikanske stranke. Jasno, to je samo zaradi načrtnega zavajanja, norčevanja, dezinformiranja in neinformiranja javnosti. Dejstvo je, da NED financira tiste skupine in ideologije, ki odgovarjajo trenutnim geopolitičnim in ideološkim smernicam liberalnega establišmenta, zato je zadnjih 15 – 20 let tudi izrazito pomemben financer skoraj izključno ”liberalne CIA”.  Če pogledano Slovenijo National Endowment for Democracy posredno in neposredno predstavlja skupaj z Open Society Foundations in občasno z Rockefeller Brothers Fund/Rockefeller Foundation, vodilnega financerja ali partnerja slovenskih predstavnikov (skrajne) levice oz. sredstev ”liberalne CIA”, kot so to Mirovni inštitut, Državljan D, Oštro, Danes je nov danInštitut za druga vprašanja in ostalih, ki so del širšega globalnega omrežja. Evropski center tega skrajno levičarskega omrežja predstavlja stranka Evropska levica, predvsem preko nemške Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung oz. nemške stranke Die Linke, katere tesna zaveznica je tudi stranka Levica. National Endowment for Democracy je tako skupaj z Rockefeller Brothers Fund/Rockefeller Foundation in Open Society Foundations skupaj financer  in partner številnih vodilnih pro-globalističnih nevladnih organizacij. In v tej umetno dodeljeni igri vlog, ki jo kot sredstvo ”liberalne CIA” igra RTV Slovenija, ti isti, recimo jim novinarji, popolnoma prikrito in nekritično podpirajo Rockefellerjevo agendo, v glavnem preko Sorosa in Open Society Foundations. In v to igro vlog sodi tudi konstantna ”anti-Janša” in ”pro-palestinska” propaganda ali pa pro-migrantska ali pro-LGBTQ ali pro-feministična ali ”okoljevarstvena” propaganda.

Po drugi strani, pa v tej igri vlog Janez Janša in njegov krog ljudi in medijev, predstavljajo National Endowment for Demcracy skoraj izključno kot financerja skrajne levice, kljub temu, da je NED v resnici del globokega Cijinega omrežja za širjenje globalizacije in ima svoj izvor pri neokonservativcih, ki so v resnici del Rockefellerjevega liberalnega establišmenta. Še več, NED in Soros sta skupaj v Sloveniji vodilna financerja in partnerja ”anti-Janševih” petkovih protestov in ”RTV stavke”. Da pa je vse skupaj resnično in načrtno zmanipulirano (poleg vseh številnih drugih dogodkov in povezav), pove tudi potovanje Janševega ministra Marka Andrijaniča, za časa ”anti-Janša” protestov in ”RTV stavke” ravno k National Endowment for Democracy, kateri naj bi zagotovil denar za Center za evropsko prihodnost. Center za evropsko prihodnost je med drugim organizator Blejskega strateškega foruma. Sam Center za evropsko prihodnost je vse od ustanovitve mednarodne svetovalne uprave povezan s soustanoviteljem Trilateral Commission Zbigniewim Brzezinskim, ki je bil med drugim v obdobju od 1988 – 1997 tudi član uprave od National Endowment for Democracy. Jasno, sam  Mark Andrijanič pa je Rockefeller Fellow od Trilateral Commission.1https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/expert/mark-boris-andrijanic/; dostop 21.1.2024 In tudi ”anti-establišment” Janez Janša se je ponosno udeležil zasedanja evropskega dela od Trilateral Commission, ko je bilo to v Ljubljani leta 2018, kar je nekritično propagirala Nova24.2https://nova24tv.si/slovenija/janez-jansa-na-srecanju-trilateralne-komisije-med-uglednimi-in-vplivnimi-gosti-iz-celega-sveta/ Sam Center za evropsko prihodnost pa je preko Javierja Solane, Timothyja Gartona Asha, Erharda Buseka (sedaj pokojni) tesno povezan s Sorosom in njegovim European Council on Foreign Relations. Vendar, to tudi ni noben problem za Janeza Janšo in njegove ”anti-Soros” kolege in medije, saj je tudi njegov kolega Sebastian Kurz (dela hkrati za vodilnega ”anti-Soros” Petra Thiela, ki je izredno tesno povezan s CIA in tudi vodilni Trumpov svetovalec), s katerim sta z Janšo postala častna člana svetovalne uprave od International Democrat Union – The Global Alliance of the Centre Right, hkrati član Sorosovega European Council on Foreign Relations. Sebastian Kurz pa je tudi tesen zaveznik Sorosa in njegovega sina Alexandra. Izredno pomemben član Centra za evropsko prihodnost pa je še pomemben član liberalnega establišmenta Tom Harkin, ki je v preteklosti sodeloval z Institute for Policy Studies, ki deluje kot vodilno ”anti-establišment” sredstvo ”liberalne CIA”.

V to isto manipuliranje javnosti pa sodi redno ”prepiranje” Janeza Janše,  Tanje Fajon in ostalih, komu je Freedom House, ki je prav tako tesen Cijin partner od National Endowment for Democracy in Open Society Foundations, podelil boljšo oceno za ”demokratizacijo” Slovenije.

RTV/MMC članki, kot ”anti-Janša” propaganda pred volitvami leta 2022

20. april 2022

Začnimo s primerom, kot je bil članek 20. aprila leta 2022, z naslovom Freedom House: Slovenija lani z največjim nazadovanjem demokracije, katerega avtorica je Bojana Rugelj.

»Poročilo ameriške nevladne organizacije Freedom House v najnovejšem letnem poročilu o državah v tranziciji omenja Slovenijo kot državo, ki je lani doživela največji upad demokracije.
Ameriška nevladna organizacija Freedom House, ki meri stopnjo svobode in demokracije po svetu, v najnovejšem letnem poročilu o državah v tranziciji opozarja, da demokracija v regiji, ki zajema območje od srednje Evrope do srednje Azije, nazaduje že 18. leto zapored. Za Slovenijo pa ugotavlja, da je doživela največji upad demokracije.
Organizacija v danes objavljenem poročilu o demokratičnosti v državah v tranziciji opozarja, da demokracija hitro izgublja moč v primerjavi z avtoritarizmom v regiji. Lani je prvič v 21. stoletju v tej regiji prevladovala oblika vladavine, ki ga organizacija imenuje “hibridni režim”, ki združuje elemente demokracije in avtokracije. …
Kot enega ključnih poudarkov poročila navaja, da demokracija v regiji nazaduje že 18. leto zapored. Agresivna vojna ruskega predsednika Vladimirja Putina proti Ukrajini bi lahko pospešila protidemokratični trend po Evropi in Evraziji, opozarjajo pri Freedom Housu.
Poročilo omenja Slovenijo kot državo, ki je lani imela največji upad demokracije. Vlada premierja Janeza Janše je v zadnjem letu zatirala svobodo medijev, spodkopala zaupanje javnosti v sodstvo in ohromila parlament, navaja poročilo, ki ob tem spomni, da je bila Slovenija dolgo po dosežkih med boljšimi.
Janševa vlada je med drugim izvedla znaten politični in finančni pritisk na organizacije civilne družbe, javne medijske storitve, sodstvo in evropsko javno tožilstvo, še piše v poročilu.«3https://www.rtvslo.si/slovenija/freedom-house-slovenija-lani-z-najvecjim-nazadovanjem-demokracije/620588

Tako RTV/MMC navaja ”anti-Janša” propagando od organizacije Freedom House, ki je tesno povezana s CIA, Council on Foreign Relations, National Endowment for Democracy, Open Society Foundations, International Republican Institute in ostalimi iz tega omrežja organizacij, ki skrbijo za ”demokratizacijo” in državne udare in barvne revolucije po svetu. Freedom House, ki sicer spada v omrežje neokonservativcev, je dejansko del propagande liberalnega establišmenta preko ”liberalne CIA”.

4. maja leta 2022 je tako Freedom House podelil Leadership Award so-ustanovitelju in dolgoletnemu predsedniku od National Endowment for Democracy Carlu Gershmanu. Istočasno sta nagrado Freedom Award dobila kubanska ”aktivista” Maykel Castillo Pérez in Luis Manuel Otero Alcántara iz Movimiento San Isidro (MSI).4https://freedomhouse.org/article/freedom-house-present-annual-awards-cuban-activists-founding-president-national-endowment Leadership Award so v preteklosti dobili še John McCain (International Republican Institute – CIA, NED), Joseph Biden, Lindsey Graham in Nancy Pelosi.

Dolgoletni predsedujoči od Freedom House je bil Peter Ackerman, ki je bil vse do smrti 26. Aprila 2022 vodilno CIA sredstvo za strategijo ”nenasilnih protestov” oz. državnih udarov in ”barvnih revolucij” po celem svetu.

Zdajšnji predsedujoči od Freedom House Michael Chertoff, je zelo vplivni predstavnik iz ozadja varnostno obveščevalne strukture liberalnega establišmenta, ki je bil v administraciji Georgea W. Busha sekretar za domovinsko varnost (2005-2009), ter bil so-avtor od USA PATRIOT Act. Za Chertoffa je ključen podatek, da je od leta 2014 član, od leta 2022 pa tudi član izvršnega odbora od Trilateral Commission. Chertoff je tesno povezan s pomembno Sorosovo zaveznico Marietje Schaake, in nasploh z najvidnejšimi ljudmi iz Sorosovega omrežja. Janševa vlada (minister Andrijanič) je s Chertoffom tesno povezana preko Trilateral Commission, sam Janša pa od leta 2011 preko Institute for Cultural Diplomacy, kjer sta oba nekaj časa člana svetovalne uprave. Tako sta bila Janša in Chertoff 11.5.2011 tudi govorca pri International Symposium on Cultural Diplomacy, ki ga je organiziral inštitut. Med drugim sta govorila na temo Protest, Revolution and Democracy in Northern Africa and the Middle East: The Role of Technology in Empowering Citizens.5https://www.culturaldiplomacy.org/academy/index.php?en_symposium_timetable Prav tako je Janša preko Institute for Cultural Diplomacy povezan s super elitno Paulo Dobriansky, ki je emeritus članica uprave od Freedom House, kot tudi bila članica uprave od National Endowment for Democracy in članica od Trilateral Commission. Ostale povezave Chertoffa –

Preko svojega vodstva je Freedom House prav tako tesno povezan s CIA, National Endowment for Democracy in seveda s Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, skupino Bilderberg, Atlantic Council in ostalimi vodilnimi organizacijami liberalnega establišmenta. Tukaj je zelo pomembna vodilna neokonservativna predstavnica liberalnega establišmenta Paula Dobriansky (bila članica uprave od NED); kot tudi Mark Palmer (so-ustanovitelj od NED); Stuart Eizenstat; Malcolm S. Forbes, Jr.; Theodore Forstmann; Robert Hormats; Anthony Lake; David Rubenstein (predsedujoči od Council on Foregin Relations); Joshua Muravchik; Diana Villiers Negroponte (žena John D. Negroponta, ki je zagotovo ključen za ustanovitev od Concordia Summit); William L. Walton (Heritage Foundation; Council for National Policy); R. James Woolsey (CIA); Morton Abramowitz; Nina Rosenwald; William Taft IV; Kenneth Juster (Council on Foreign Relations; Trilateral Commission; Weatherhead Center for International Affairs – CIA; American Ditchley Foundation; Arnold & Porter; Warburg Pincus).

Financerji od Freedom House – 

Nova24 tega poročila od Freedom House iz leta 2022, ki je bil ”kritičen” do Janševe vlade ni objavila. Je pa zato objavila poročilo od Freedom House iz leta 2021 –

»Očitno se nekateri ne zmorejo sprijazniti z nedavnimi izsledki rezultatov poročila ameriške nevladne organizacije Freedom House, ki kažejo, da je Slovenija na lestvici, s katero merijo raven svobode, za leto 2020 prejela 95 točk. Kar pa je za eno točko več, kot leto prej. Vodja poslanske skupine LMŠ Brane Golubović se namreč sklicuje kar na izsledke lanskoletnega poročila in poskuša v javnosti ustvariti vtis, kako naj bi se vladna garnitura kitila z uspehi, ki naj bi predstavljali zaslugo dela vlade Marjana Šarca. … Brane Golubović je namreč zatrdil naslednje: “14. najbolj svobodna država na svetu glede na podatke in stanje v državi leta 2019, ko je vlado vodil Marjan Šarec. Ta del nekateri zavestno pozabijo navesti, ko se hvalijo s poročilom Freedom House za leto 2020.” Očitno je, da je Golubović s tem poskušal ustvariti vtis, kako naj bi vlada lagala. Dejstvo pa je, da je Golubović objavil lanskoletno poročilo, v katerem so bili zajeti podatki za leto 2019 in kjer je Slovenija ocenjena slabše. … Tudi Šarčev svetovalec Damir Črnčec namreč vztraja, kako naj bi [Janševa] vlada prebrala napačno metodologijo. Preko Twitterja je namreč Šarčeva desna roka zapisala: “Podporniki aktualne vlade se hvalijo s poročilom Freedom House za leto 2020. Samo “pozabili” so omeniti, da so zajeti podatki za l. 2019. Predlagam kratek pogled v metodologijo. Kot običajno, se kitijo s tujim perjem. Pod vlado Marjana Šarca smo bili uvrščeni tako visoko. #2021?” Zanimivo pa je, da ravno ta, ki drugim očita, kako niso temeljito prebrali metodologije, sam tega zagotovo ni storil. Na voljo so namreč podatki za vsako leto posebej. Če bi jih pogledal, bi lahko videl, da je Slovenija za leto 2020 prejela večjo število točk na lestvici, s kateri se meri raven svobode. Nekateri lahko prodajajo marsikaj, a matematične zakonitosti so jasne, številka 95 je več kot 94. Pa naj se nekdo še toliko postavlja na glavo.«12https://nova24tv.si/slovenija/politika/sprijaznite-se-visja-raven-svobode-pod-aktualno-vlado-je-uradno-dejstvo-ki-ga-ne-morete-zanikati/

V zgornjem primeru se lepo vidi, kako slovenski politiki v javnosti tekmujejo, kateri bo boljši služabnik od CIA/National Endowment for Democracy/Open Society Foundations oz. od liberalnega stablišmenta. Skladno s tem se junija leta 2022 propadla LMŠ združi z Golobovo stranko Gibanje svoboda.

Leta 2020 sta se glede poročila od Freedom House preko twitterja po otročje, kot je za te skrajne manipulatorje in dezinformatorje značilno, ”prepirala” Sorosovo sredstvo Tanja Fajon iz SD in Vinko Gorenak iz SDS –

Fajon
»Saj nisem jaz, spoštovani Vinko. To je danes objavljeno poročilo Freedom House. Saj ste verjetno videli. Ugotavlja resno zniževanje demokratičnih standardov, ko gre za vladanje, pravosodje, izvedbo volitev, svobodo medijev. In Madžarska je po poročilu zabeležila največji padec13https://twitter.com/tfajon/status/1258107950691909632
Gorenak
»A boste že enkrat nehala z Madžarsko, poglejte si malo v Francijo, kjer vladajo vaši in poglejte si tam policijske postopke z rumenimi jopiči. Kaj takega ni počela niti nekdanja milica, tudi tista leta 1967, ko so bili v Lj študentski nemiri ne14https://twitter.com/drVinkoGorenak/status/1258103772523507713

Vsi slovenski politiki, od skrajno leve do skrajno desne, skozi celotno zgodovino dokazujejo, kako zvesti in brez hrbtenični služabniki liberalnega establišmenta/CIA so v resnici. V javnosti se igrajo nasprotnike, hkrati pa ko pride poročilo od takšne pomembne Cijine organizacije, kot je Freedom House, pa namesto, da bi se vsaj distancirali od same ocene, ker je ta resnično samo pro-globalistična propaganda super elite, pridemo kot v zgornjem primeru na primitivno nizek nivo Fajonove in Gorenaka, kar je politična stalnica v Sloveniji. Nobeden od teh niti približno ni nikoli javnosti razložil, kdo so ljudje in organizacije, ki stojijo za nazivom Freedom House. Peter Ackerman je celo mentor skupini CANVAS, iz katere Srdja Popović med ”anti-Janša” protesti na povabilo Sorosovega Mirovnega Inštituta pride v Slovenijo. SDS tudi ne izpostavijo, da je ta financiran s strani njihovega ”sovražnika” št. 1 Sorosa, kot tudi ostalih vodilnih fundacij ”liberalne CIA”. Prav tako Fajonova ne izpostavi dejstev, da je ta, poleg tega, da se gre za Cijino organizacijo, financiran še s strani ključnih fundacij ”konservativne CIA” (sicer del liberalnega establišmenta), kot so Smith Richardson Foundation, Sarah Scaife Foundation in Achelis and Bodman Foundation, ki so ključni financerji močne in vplivne Cije. 

27. april 2022

Naslednji takšnen primer je bil ”anti-Janša” članek Svet Evrope: Slovenija država na poti vladne ugrabitve medijev, objavljen tik pred volitvami 27. aprila 2022, katerega avtor je Aljoša Masten. Sam Janša (uradno) sicer skrajno desni populist, ki deluje kot sredstvo ”konservativne CIA”, hkrati pa tesno povezan z liberalno super elito in tudi z organizacijami ”liberalne CIA”, tam kjer je ključno. Poleg Sveta Evrope (tesno povezan z Rockefellerjevimi/Sorosovimi interesi) so osebe, ki jih Masten citira v članku, in to ni nobeno naključje, ki so tesno povezane z National Endowment for Democracy, Sorosovo Open Society Foundations, Ford Foundation in ostalimi organizacijami in korporacijami, ki so vodilni financerji in propagandisti ideologij ”liberalne CIA”. Med njimi, znotraj tega omrežja so tudi posamezne medijske hiše, kot je Al Jazeera, ki jih financira Katar, ki je poleg Savdske Arabije vodilni svetovni financer skrajnega islama in terorizma.

»Svet Evrope: Slovenija država na poti vladne ugrabitve medijev.
Platforma Sveta Evrope za zaščito novinarstva in varnost novinarjev je objavila poročilo o stanju na področju svobode medijev v Evropi za lani. V njem posebej omenja tudi Slovenijo, pogosto v družbi Madžarske in Poljske.
Omenjeni so tviti premierja Janeza Janše, diskreditacije novinarjev, vlaganje serijskih tožb proti njim, vdor nasprotnikov cepljenja na RTV Slovenija in poskus vladnega vpliva na RTV SLO, je za Radio Slovenija poročala Maja Derčar.
Slovenija je v četrtem poročilu Sveta Evrope za zaščito novinarstva omenjena kot država z naraščajočimi nadlegovanji in zasmehovanji novinarjev ter država na poti vladne ugrabitve medijev. Oliver Money-Kyrle z mednarodnega medijskega inštituta se odziva na trditve premierja Janeza Janše, da so mediji pri nas svobodni, saj noben novinar ni zaprt. “Slovenija je bila precej zgledna v medijski svobodi razen zadnji dve leti, ko jo je vlada skušala spodkopati. Janša pravi, da spoštuje svobodo, obenem pa si s položaja moči skuša podrediti javne medije – to že ni svoboda – z vladnimi sredstvi pa krepi strankarsko propagando. Skrb vzbujajoča je tudi vključitev madžarskega kapitala v lastništvo SDS-ovih medijev. … ”
Vedno večja težava tudi pri nas postajajo t. i. tožbe SLAPP, to so serijske tožbe, katerih namen je utišanje in nadlegovanje novinarjev. Jessica Ni Majnin iz organizacije Index on Censorship je povedala:
“V nebo vpijoč primer v Sloveniji je 39 tožb zoper novinarje portala necenzurirano, ki jih je vložil davčni svetovalec in SDS-ov operativec Rok Snežič.” Jessica pravi, da platforma Sveta Evrope pomaga opozarjati, kadar gre za tovrstne tožbe, ki pomenijo svojevrsten napad. Evropska komisija je prav danes predstavila direktivo za boj proti tožbam SLAPP, ki med drugim predvideva zgodnjo zavrnitev takšnih sodnih postopkov.«15https://www.rtvslo.si/slovenija/svet-evrope-slovenija-drzava-na-poti-vladne-ugrabitve-medijev/625507; dostop 2.5.2022

Analiza

»Austrian Federal Ministry for Europe, Integration and Foreign Affairs. European Commission. Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom. Fondation Nicolas Puech. Fritt Ord Foundation. Global Affairs Canada. Government of Sweden. Helsingin Sanomat Foundation. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung [vodilni nemški partner od NED in ostalih iz omrežja ”liberalne CIA”]. National Endowment for Democracy. Open Society Foundations. IFEX. UNESCO – Global Media Defence Fund«16https://ipi.media/about/supporters-and-partners/; 2.5.2022

»Al-Araby Al-Jadeed (Qatar) [Katar je vodilni financer skrajnega islama in terorizma; vodilni financer skrajne Muslimanske bratovščine, ki je del omrežja od Al-Kajde in Hamasa]. Al-Araby TV (UK). Al Jazeera Media Network (Qatar) [Al Jazeera pomemben promotor skrajne Muslimanske bratovščine in skrajnega islamizma]. Austrian Broadcasting Corporation/ORF (Austria) … Northwestern University in Qatar (Qatar) … Syrian Center for Media and Freedom of Expression (SCM). Syria TV (Faadat Media). ZDF (Germany)«17https://ipi.media/about/supporters-and-partners/; 2.5.2022

»ORF. Konrad Adenauer Stiftung. OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media. US Mission to the OSCE. IMS – Independent Media Support. Aljazeera Media Network. Erste Stiftung. Craig Newmark Philanthropies [del ”liberalne CIA”]. Columbia Journalism School [pomemben propagandist ”liberalne CIA”]… OCCRP – Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project [del ”liberalne CIA”] … Project Syndicate [vodilni financer in pisec George Soros]«18https://ipi.media/about/supporters-and-partners/; 2.5.2022

»Clifford ChanceFacebook [del od CFR; del od Sun Valley Meetings; Peter Thiel] … European Commission … Fritt Ord. Google [del od CFR; del od Sun Valley Meetings] … Charles Koch Institute … National Endowment for DemocracyOSF [Open Society Foundations] … Twitter [del od Sun Valley Meetings] … Vodafone«20https://www.indexoncensorship.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Index_Annual_Review_2019_v04_low.pdf; str. 19

»Air BnB [del od Sun Valley Meetings]… The British Council … European CommissionFacebook [del od CFR; del od Sun Valley Meetings; Peter Thiel]… Fritt Ord. Google [del od CFR; del od Sun Valley Meetings]… The Guardian [del ”liberalne CIA”]… National Endowment for Democracy. Open Society Foundation … Twitter [del od Sun Valley Meetings]«21https://www.indexoncensorship.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/WSET-Signed-Accs-Mar-16.pdf; str. 5

»Eranda Foundation RothschildGuardian Media Group … Sasakawa Foundation«22https://www.indexoncensorship.org/Documents/WSETacs2009.pdf; str. 16

22. maj 2022

25.5.2022, dva dni po RTV ”stavki”, je RTV/MMC objavil članek NED: ameriški vzvod za promocijo demokracije (in spodkopavanje režimov), katerega avtorica Kaja Sajovic deluje kot klasično sredstvo ”liberalne CIA”. Iz zapisa Sajovičeve, glede na prej omenjeni članek iz 27.4.2022, lahko logično sklepamo, da je RTV Slovenija/MMC skupaj z NED (CIA), Open Society Foundations in Evropsko komisijo pred volitvami širila ameriško zunanje geopolitično agendo, ko je širila ”proti-Janševo” propagando. Tudi lahko sklepamo (če parafriziramo besede Kaje Sajovic), da je RTV Slovenija/MMC, kot sredstvo ”liberalne CIA” s tem blagoslovom od NED (CIA) dobila sebi ljubo Golobovo koalicijo, v kateri sta še sredstvi ”liberalne CIA” Levica in SD, kot še ostali priveski, ki jim ni uspelo priti direktno v parlament. Vendar, tukaj se vidi, kako je vse skupaj načrtna igra za pranje možganov javnosti. Janšev (Trilateral Commission; Institute for Cultural Democracy; Blejski strateški forum) pro-globalistični minister Mark Andrijanič, ki je tesno povezan z vodilnimi organizacijami liberalnega establišmenta (Rockefeller Fellow – Trilateral Commission; Fellow – Atlantic Council; Young Global Leader – World Economic Forum; Uber – top financer ”liberalne CIA”), ki so ključni kreator ideologije ”liberalne CIA” in prav tako financirane s strani ”liberalne CIA”, se je konec marca 2022 med obiskom v ZDA srečal ravno z vodstvom od National Endowment for Democracy, glede zagotovitve finančnih sredstev za Center za evropsko prihodnost. Pri tem Janše in Nova24 seveda v resnici ne moti dejstvo, da je NED pri delanju državnih udarov eden od ključnih Sorosovih partnerjev. Soros, ki je eden od vodilnih financerjev ”liberalne CIA” in tudi pomemben partner in ali financer slovenskih političnih predstavnikov, kot so Gibanje Svoboda (Urška Klakočar Zupančič – ena prvih slovenskih Sorosovih štipendistk), SD (Tanja Fajon – ex-European Council on Foreign Relations; Samuel Žbogar – European Council on Foreign Relations), SAB (Angelika Mlinar – uradni zanesljivi Sorosov partner v Evropskem parlamentu), Levica (Luka Mesec, Asta Vrečko – Delavsko-punkerska Univerza, financirana s strani Sorosa), Mirovni inštitut (po dolgem in po čez del omrežja od Sorosa in National Endowment for Democray, in nasploh propagandist ”liberalne CIA”; pomemben ”anti-Janša” propagandist, zato v Ljubljano pripelje top CIA sredstvo za državne udare Srđa Popovića), Tea Jarc (sindikat Mladi plus), Spletno oko, Amnesty International Slovenija, Medijska preža in ostalih. V to isto skupino pa seveda spada tudi Nika Kovač iz Inštitut 8. Marec, ki je podaljšana roka od Obama Foundation (John Doerr; Connie Ballmer; Penny Pritzker; Robert Wolff).

Kot je skrajno skopo poročala Nova24 – 

»Nazadnje se je minister [Andrijanič] srečal z vodstvom nadstrankarske ustanove National Endowment for Democracy (NED), ki deluje v okviru ameriškega kongresa. Z direktorjem sta spregovorila o krepitvi sodelovanja s Centrom za evropsko prihodnost, ki deluje v Sloveniji. Dotaknila sta se tudi številnih programov, s katerimi NED spodbuja demokracijo in civilno družbo v Ukrajini in državah Zahodnega Balkana. Direktor je izrazil zahvalo Sloveniji za izjemno proaktivno vlogo pri reševanju ukrajinske krize in približevanju držav Zahodnega Balkana EU23https://nova24tv.si/slovenija/politika/minister-andrijanic-v-zda-o-krepitvi-tehnoloskih-nalozb-v-sloveniji/; dostop 25.5.2022

To pa še ni vse.

»Minister za digitalno preobrazbo Mark Boris Andrijanič je med 20. in 25. marcem obiskal Združene države Amerike, kjer se je med drugim srečal z ameriškimi institucijami in vodilnimi tehnološkimi podjetji, kot so Apple [vodilni financer ”liberalne CIA”; del Sun Valley Meetings], Google [vodilni financer ”liberalne CIA”; del od CFR; del Sun Valley Meetings; tesno povezan s CIA], Tesla [del Sun Valley Meetings; Musk deluje kot sredstvo ”konservativne CIA”; tesno povezan z liberalnim establišmentom in Petrom Thielom], Meta [vodilni financer ”liberalne CIA”; del od CFR; del Sun Valley Meetings], Amazon [vodilni financer ”liberalne CIA”; del Sun Valley Meetings; tesno povezan s CIA in njenim programom visokotehnološkega video nadzora], Starlink [Elon Musk – propagandist ”konservativne CIA”] in NVIDIA. Pogovori so bili osredotočeni na krepitev tehnoloških naložb v Sloveniji, odprtju slovenskega razvojno-gospodarskega predstavništva v Silicijevi dolini in spodbujanje znanstveno-raziskovalnega sodelovanja med državama. Beseda je tekla tudi o tehnološki pomoči Ukrajini in ukrajinskim beguncem v Sloveniji ter drugod v Evropi. …
Obiskal je tudi Stanfordski center za umetno inteligenco in Hoover Institution [del ”konservativne CIA”], kjer ga je sprejel dr. Larry Diamond [član Council on Foreign Relations; direktor pri International Forum for Democratic Studies – National Endowment for Democracy; Senior Fellow pri Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies; član svetovalne uprave pri Tahrir Institute for Middle East Policy; član uprave od Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence], ki je eden vodilnih strokovnjakov za mednarodne odnose in varnostna vprašanja.«Ibid.

RTV/MMC članek o National Endowment for Democracy

Članek od Kaje Sajovic o NED, je napisan kot propaganda ”liberalne CIA”, katere namen je nekemu povprečnemu bralcu dati občutek, da dobiva pomembne in ključne informacije. Kar je seveda daleč, daleč od resnice. Namen ”novinarjev” kot je Sajovic je izključno dezinfirmiranje in neinformiranje javnosti. Tako Sajovic, kot tudi Masten sama sebe in RTV/MMC v resnici postavita v vlogo ne samo velikih hinavcev in manipulatorjev, ampak velike sramote od človeka in same inštitucije, ki sta za ta takšne propagandne prispevke dobro plačana s strani obveznega javnega prispevka. Vendar če večina javnosti to podpira, naj to ima, a se lepo vidi, kako hinavska, in pa neumna in brez vrednot je takšna družba, ki samovoljno dopusti, da se ji pere možgane. Kar se je tudi potrdilo z referendumom o RTV.  Med drugim Sajovic nikjer ne omeni oz. ne razkrije, da je tudi RTV/MMC del omrežja in propagande od National Endowment for Democracy (kot tudi od Open Society Foundations), kot je to bilo med drugim lepo razvidno iz prej omenjenega Mastenovega članka –

»Ta mesec se je vodja urada ukrajinskega predsednika Andrij Jermak srečal z Damonom Wilsonom [Atlantic Council; Globsec – Anton Rop; Save the Children; NATO Defense Collefe Foundation; U.S.-Ukraine Business Council; World Movement for Democracy; African Affairs Directorate – National Security Council; Strengthening Transatlantic Cooperation – German Marshall Fund; Warsaw Security Forum; Delphi Economic Forum], ameriškim strokovnjakom za zunanjo politiko in predsednikom Nacionalne podpore za demokracijo (NED). …
Novica o obisku ni bila deležna prav kaj dosti pozornosti svetovne javnosti – še eden v dolgi vrsti obiskov tujih državnikov v Kijevu, kjer gost stisne roko okupiranemu gostitelju in izrazi vso podporo Ukrajini. A NED ni običajen birokratski aparat, njegova zgodovina je dolga – in pogosto najmanj sporna, v najslabšem primeru pa krvava. NED je bil ustanovljen leta 1983, v času predsednika Ronalda Reagana, kot dvostrankarska organizacija, ki se rada označuje za nevladno in neprofitno, a deluje dejansko po napotkih ameriške vlade [v resnici dela za liberalni establišment] ter se zanaša na finančno podporo Bele hiše in kongresa. Z državnimi in zasebnimi sredstvi financira in podpira politike, uperjene v spreminjanje režimov po vsem svetu. Kot tak je NED ključen pri uveljavljanju ameriške mehke moči v svetu in nameni 170 milijonov dolarjev letno organizacijam, ki skrbijo za podporo ali nastavljanje ZDA naklonjenih režimov, hkrati pa spodkopava vlade, ki nasprotujejo ameriški vojaški ali gospodarski politiki, in podžiga protivladno opozicijo [RTV Slovenija/MMC ”anti-SDS” in ”anti-Janša” propaganda s pomočjo NED in Open Society Foundations financiranih nevladnih organizacij].
“V teh težkih časih razumemo, kdo so naši prijatelji in strateški partnerji. In, jasno, ZDA igrajo izjemno pomembno vlogo v podpori Ukrajini,” je dejal ob obisku Jermak, ki zdaj po Wilsonu, ministrih Antonyju Blinknu [Council on Foreign Relations; Center for Strategic and International Studies – CIA , Pentagon; U.S. International Development Finance Corporation; Millennium Challenge Corporation; WestExec Advisors; National Security Council; CNN analitik; Munich Security Conference; Concordia Summit; njegov bankirski oče, ki je bil tudi član od CFR je tesno povezan s Sorosom, po njemu se na Madžarskem imenuje Vera and Donald Blinken Open Society Archives, ki je povezan tudi s Central European University] in Lloydu Austinu [Council on Foreign Relations; American Academy of Diplomacy; Carnegie Corporation of New York – top financer ”liberalne CIA”; Raytheon Technologies; United Technologies Corporation; National Security Council; Boule – Sigma Pi Phi] ter predsednici predstavniškega doma kongresa Nancy Pelosi [Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights; Generation Engage; Population Institute; Munich Security Conference; World Affairs Council on Northern California; Progressive Forum; The Common Good; Lesbians who Tech + Allies; Occupy Wall Street; Netroots Nations] v Kijevu čaka samo še na predsednika Joeja Bidna [kot top predstavnik liberalnega establišmenta pomemben propagandist radikalne ideologije ”liberalne CIA”]. …
“Svetovne zadeve”, v katere se je vmešal? Med drugim je NED vlogo odigral v razpadu Sovjetske zveze, v vrtnični revoluciji v Gruziji [skupaj s Sorosom in ostalimi CIA sredstvi ”liberalne CIA” kot so CANVAS, kjer pride na oblast Sorosov varovanec Mikhail Saakashvili], ki je privedla do odstopa [sicer relativno pro-ameriškega] predsednika Eduarda Ševarnadzeja, NED pa je de facto “izbral” opozicijske voditelje, v žametni revoluciji v Srbiji, v kateri je bila strmoglavljena vlada Slobodana Miloševića, zatem pa financiral srbsko opozicijo [CIA sredstva kot so Otpor! in CANVAS; del tega kasneje tudi ”anti-Janša” protesti leta 2013 preko RTV/MMC propagande, kjer je njihov gost Srdja Popović], in v revoluciji v Boliviji, ki je privedla do odstopa Eva Moralesa, pod katerim je ta država uživala največ politične stabilnosti in najhitrejšo rast v Južni Ameriki. NED je sicer leta krepil sile, ki so si prizadevale strmoglaviti Moralesa. Med letoma 2013 in 2018 sta NED in USAID opoziciji namenila kar 70 milijonov dolarjev. …
NED je bil akter tudi v padcu vlade Hosnija Mubaraka v Egiptu leta 2011, v arabski pomladi, kjer so financirali proameriške posameznike [skupaj z ”liberalno CIA” v glavnem skrajne islamiste iz Muslimanske bratovščine] in skupine ter v oranžni revoluciji [Orange Circle – Zbigniew Brzezinski; Carla Hills; Madeleine Albright; Vitali Klitschko; Viktor Yushchenko; Carl Bildt – Soros; Bruce Jackson; Emma Bonino – Soros] v Ukrajini leta 2004, ko so ZDA prek NED-a in drugih organizacij ukrajinski opoziciji namenile skupno 65 milijonov dolarjev, medtem ko je med majdansko revolucijo NED financiral okoli 65 nevladnih organizacij po državi in zagotovil celo sredstva, s katerimi so plačevali protestnike. …
Krvavi prsti Elliotta Abramsa
V NED-ovem odboru direktorjev med drugim sedi, denimo, Elliott Abrams [Council on Foreign Relations; Saban Center for Middle East Policy – Brookings Institute; Center for Security Policy; American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus; Committee for Peace and Security in the Gulf; U.S. Committee for a Free Lebanon; NGO Monitor; American Jewish Committee; Tikvah Fund; Middle East Media Research Institute; Jewish People Policy Institute; Hudson Institute; Committee for the Free World; Group of 50; Israel Democracy Institute; Europeaeum; Institute for National Security Studies; Foreign Policy Association; Jewish Leadership Conference; The Common Good; McCain Institute for International Leadership], sporni in razvpiti diplomat, znan po svoji vlogi v aferi Iran-Contra (predsednik George Bush starejši ga je leta 1992 pomilostil) ter močno spornih političnih angažmajih v Gvatemali, Salvadorju in Nikaragvi v 80. letih pod predsednikom Reaganom. Abrams je tako z vojaško pomočjo asistiral gvatemalskemu diktatorju Efrainu Riosu Monttu, ki je prišel na oblast z udarom, pozneje pa je bil obsojen zaradi genocida nad gvatemalskimi staroselci.
Medtem je v Salvadorju takratna ameriška vlada finančno in drugače sponzorirala vlado, ki je izvajala pokol nad stotinami civilistov, Abrams pa je pred senatnim odborom pričal, da gre za “močno pretirana poročila”. In tudi pozneje, ko se je izkazalo, da so bile navedbe o pokolu popolnoma točne, je politiko Washingtona v Salvadorju označil za “izjemen dosežek”. Nazadnje je Abramsa angažiral tudi Donald Trump, ko je leta 2019 skušal rušiti vlado Nicolasa Madura v Venezueli in tam ustoličiti ZDA precej bolj naklonjenega Juana Guaidoja [financer tudi Soros; sama ”anti-Chavez” politika dejansko vodena s strani Council on Foreign Relations, tudi preko CIA sredstev kot so Albert Einstein Institute in CANVAS].
NED sicer kritizirajo tako z leve kot z desne strani ameriškega političnega spektra. Kot piše v svoji knjigi Politics Latin America (2007) Gavin O’Toole, nekateri na desni organizacijo obtožujejo socialdemokratske agende, nekateri na levi pa, da gre za “desničarsko pobudo”, naravnano na Reaganovo politiko hladne vojne.
Znotraj Latinske Amerike kritiki obtožujejo NED manifestiranja ameriškega paternalizma ali imperializma, podporniki pa, da pomaga številnim skupinam s socialdemokratsko in liberalno usmeritvijo po vsem svetu, usposablja in podpira prodemokratične skupine, ki kritizirajo ZDA.
NED kot druga CIA?
Eric T. Hale pa je leta 2003 v svoji doktorski disertaciji “Kvantitivna in kvalitativna ocena NED-a” poudaril, da kritiki organizacije postavljajo pod vprašaj tudi, ali NED dejansko res sledi altruističnemu cilju promoviranja demokracije in odprtega trga, saj da ima organizacija za svojimi dejavnostmi bolj egoističen motiv – promocijo interesov ZDA. Ti kritiki tudi poudarjajo, da NED ni nikdar financiral skupine, katere agenda bi bila v nasprotju z interesi ZDA.
Leta 1986 je predsednik NED-a Carl Gershman dejal, da je bil NED ustanovljen, “ker bi bilo grozno za demokratične skupine po vsem svetu, da bi bilo videti, kot da jih subvencionira CIA. To smo videli v 60. letih in zato smo to opustili”. …
Leta 2010 je neprofitna preiskovalna organizacija ProPublica [del ”liberalne CIA”; med drugim financirana ravno s strani Sorosa, tesnega zaveznika od NED] v svoji preiskavi poudarila, da “so tisti, ki so bili na čelu postavitve NED-a, že davno priznali, da je del prizadevanj pomakniti se od prikritih do odkritih prizadevanj spodbujanja demokracije”, kot dokaz pa navedli intervju iz leta 1991, v katerem je takratni predsednik NED-a Allen Weinstein [Fulbright Scholar; U.S. Institute of Peace; Center for Democracy; Consortium for the Study of Intelligence – National Strategy Information Center; Colloquium on Counterintelligence conference; Colloquium on Clandestine Collection conference; Coalition for Democratic Majority; International Foundation for Electoral Systems; The Global Panel; International Institute for Democracy; Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions; Foreign Policy Association] dejal, da “veliko tega, kar počnemo danes, je pred 25 leti prikrito delala CIA”.
Prav tako leta 1991 je urednik Washington Posta [top sredstvo liberalnega establišmenta in CIA] David Ignatius [Council on Foreign Relations; Colloquium on Counterintelligence conference; Saban Center for Middle East Policy – Brookings Institute; German Marshall Fund; Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs; International; Spy Museum; Munich Security Conference; Sun Valley Meetings; Institute for National Security Studies; World Affairs Council on Northern California; Center for Strategic and International Studies] v članku “Novi svet pučev brez vohunov” zapisal, da NED deluje v bistvu tako, da “dela javno tisto, kar je CIA svoj čas počela skrivoma”. …
Ko govorimo o ukrajinski majdanski revoluciji, v kateri je leta 2014 padla proruska vlada takratnega predsednika Viktorja Janukoviča, se pogosto zanemarja dejavno ameriško vlogo v destabilizaciji Janukovičeve vlade. To so ZDA počele prek mehanizmov, kot sta ravno NED in USAID (Agencija za mednarodni razvoj), prek katerih so podžigale protivladna prizadevanja v državi.
V Ukrajini je bil med prejemniki NED-ovih sredstev tudi Mednarodni republikanski inštitut (IRI), ki mu je svoj čas predsedoval pokojni republikanski senator John McCain [Vodilni neokonservativec in top predstavnik liberalnega establišmenta; pomemben promotor ”liberalne CIA” in skrajnega islama za delanje državnih udarov. Povezave – Council on Foreign Relations; Nixon Center – Center for the National Interest; Special Operations Warrior Foundation; Spirit of America; McCain Institute for International Leadership; Clements Center for National Security; Shadow Convention – George Soros; Munich Security Conference; World Economic Forum; Concordia Summit; Forstmann Little Conferences; Commonwealth Club of California; World Affairs Council on Northern California; The Common Good], ki je med protesti v Ukrajini leta 2014 z drugimi predstavniki ameriških oblasti osebno letel v Ukrajino, da bi spodbujal protestnike, navaja FAIR [del ”liberalne CIA”; financerji – Plougshares Fund, Ford Foundation, John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Rockefeller Family Fund, Samuel Rubin Foundation, Schumann Center for Media and Democracy, Barbra Streisand Foundation, Tides Foundation, Craigslist Charitable Fund; promotorji top sredstva ”liberalne CIA” Bernieja Sandersa]24https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/fairness-and-accuracy-in-reporting-fair/; dostop 25.5.2022 [John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation – $625,000 od 1992 – 1997]25https://www.macfound.org/grantee/fairness–accuracy-in-reporting-3199/; dostop 25.5.2022, ameriška progresivna skupina za nadzor nad mediji. …
A že leta 2013 je predsednik NED-a Carl Gershman [Council on Foreign Relations; Freedom House; Henry Jackson Society; Kissinger Commission; Afghanistan-America Foundation; Vaclav Havel Library Foundation; Anti-Defamation League; George W. Bush Institute; Human Freedom Advisory Council; Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy] v kolumni za Washington Post z naslovom “Nekdanje sovjetske države so se postavile po robu Rusiji. Se bodo ZDA?” Ukrajino označil za “največjo nagrado” v tekmi med Vzhodom in Zahodom.
Decembra 2013 je takratna namestnica ameriškega državnega sekretarja za evropske zadeve Victoria Nuland [Council on Foreign Relations; Center for a New American Security; Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs; Brookings Institution; Albright Stonebridge Group; American Academy of Diplomacy] in dolgoletna zagovornica spremembe režima v Ukrajini, ki se je pozneje pridružila nadzornemu svetu NED-a, dejala, da so ZDA od leta 1991 porabile pet milijard dolarjev za “promocijo demokracije” v Ukrajini.
Denar je šel v podporo višjim predstavnikom ukrajinske vlade, določenim poslovnežem in opozicijski civilni družbi, naklonjeni ameriškim interesom in ciljem.
Moskva je sicer pogosto NED označevala kot sovražno do Rusije in za množične proteste v Ukrajini leta 2014, ki so pripeljali do odstopa Janukoviča, krivila prav NED-ovo financiranje. Leta 2015 je ruska vlada NED razglasila za “nezaželeno” nevladno organizacijo, s čimer je NED postala prva organizacija, prepovedana pod novim ruskim zakonom o nezaželenih organizacijah, sprejetim dva meseca predtem. …
NED je prejšnji teden dokončno stopil na žulj tudi Kitajski, ki ga je sicer že leta 2019 sankcionirala zaradi domnevnega skrivnega spodbujanja protestov v Hongkongu [financer protestov tudi Soros] in ker da NED deluje kot “krinka ameriških obveščevalnih dejavnosti ZDA”. …
S kitajsko oceno NED-ja se strinja tudi Luis Rene Fernandez, kubanski akademik na Univerzi v Havani, ki je za latinskoameriško TV-mrežo TeleSUR povedal, da uporabljajo ameriške vlade NED za “rušenje političnega reda suverenih držav in vmešavanje v njihove notranje zadeve”.
NED deluje kot fasada za prave interese ameriške vlade, bodisi z usposabljanjem bodisi s financiranjem prevratniških organizacij, je poudaril Fernandez, nekdanji raziskovalec na kubanskem centru za ameriške študije. Na Kubi NED podpira že 60 let trajajoči ameriški embargo, katerega cilj je ravno spodkopati stebre političnega sistema v tej karibski državi, še navaja Fernandez.
“Ameriška vlada je NED-u omogočila finančna sredstva in podporo za spreminjanje ustavne ureditve na Kubi,” je dejal Fernandez in spomnil, da je NED stal tudi za številnimi državnimi udari v Latinski Ameriki in t. i. barvnimi revolucijami v Evropi in Afriki.«26https://www.rtvslo.si/svet/s-in-j-amerika/ned-ameriski-vzvod-za-promocijo-demokracije-in-spodkopavanje-rezimov/628195; dostop 25.5.2022

Kaja Sajovic nikjer v članku ne omeni ključnih nevladnih organizacij liberalnega establišmenta, s katerimi so povezani zgoraj omenjeni akterji iz National Endowment for Democracy, kar je še en odličen primer, kako načrtno zavajajoči in neinformativni/dezinformativni so takšni članki. Vodilna organizacija, ki se vseskozi pojavlja je seveda Council on Foreign Relations. Izredno pomembne pa so tudi njihove povezave s Trilateral Commission, skupina Bilderberg, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Brookings Institute, Freedom House, U.S. Institute of Peace, Munich Security Conference, Concordia Summit in ostalimi.
In največja manipulacija in prikrivanje dejstev v članku je, da nikjer v njem niso omenjene in analizirane ključne osebe liberalnega establišmetna, ki so delovale v NED, kot so to Henry Kissinger (vodilni strateg Davida Rockefellerja in liberalnega establišmenta, Zbigniew Brzezinski (poleg Kissingerja vodilni strateg Davida Rockefellerja in liberalnega establišmenta), NED-ov ustanovni predsedujoči John Richardson Jr. (Council on Foreign Relations, 1957 – 2010; National Committee for a Free Europe – CIA; Center for Strategic and International Studies – CIA/Pentagon; United States Institute of Peace; International Rescue Committee – CIA; Radio Free Europe – CIA; Sullivan & Cromwell; Paine Webber), Lane Kirkland (Council on Foreign Relations; Trilateral Commission; AFL-CIO), Walter Mondale, Ed Muskie, Winston Lord, Madeleine Albright, David Gergen, Paula Dobriansky, Paul Wolfowitz, Lee Hamilton, Morton Abramowitz, Frank Carlucci, general Wesley Clark, Richard Holbrooke, general Richard V. Allen, Larry Diamond in še cela vrsta ostalih, ki so ključni predstavniki liberalnega establišmenta. S samim NED pa so sodelovali še Joe Biden, John C. Whitehead, Barbara Haig in ostali.

Naj spomnim, stavka RTV/MMC 23.5.2022 je potekala pod sloganom Stavkamo, ker nismo hlapci, smo javni RTV. Pa še kakšni hlapci in manipulatorji.

Podporniki stavke od RTV Slovenija/MMC

”Stavko” na RTV/MMC so za točno takšno načrtno manipuliranje, dezinformiranje, neinformiranje in zavajanje javnosti podprli –

RTV uslužbenci

Boris Vasev

»MMC-jev novinar Boris Vasev je v nagovoru opozoril, da se ne dogaja zgolj “politizacija” pač pa “strankarizacija” javne RTV. Jadranka Rebernik in Igor Pirkovič po njegovih besedah ostremu nasprotovanju uredništev navkljub želita urejati informativni program. “V mandatu prejšnje vlade sta služila na račun sodelovanja z vlado, Pirkovič kot scenarist državnih proslav, Rebernik pa po poročanju Mladine preko svojega inštituta, takšen konflikt interesov je nesprejemljiv, nekaj, kar te diskreditira kot novinarja, kaj šele kot urednika,” je dejal in dodal, da ostajata na položaju, ker imata slepo podporo vodstva.

“V vodstvu je Uroš Urbanija, pri katerem ne smemo pozabiti, da je bil še pred nekaj meseci piarovec vlade, ki je uživala podporo neonacistov in ki je neonacistom vračala to podporo preko ministrstva za kulturo, ki je bil pod nadzorom SDS-a,” je še pristavil in dodal, da je vsem pot do položaja omogočil generalni direktor Grah Whatmough.

“Vodstvu in vsem, ki ga tiho podpirajo, moramo kot kolektiv reči ne in za tem tudi stati,” je sklenil Vasev27https://www.rtvslo.si/slovenija/shod-za-javno-rtv-unicevanje-rtv-slovenija-se-mora-koncati/641654

Boris Vasev poleg tega, da deluje kot ”anti-Janša” propagandist, je hkrati tudi pro-palestinsko sredstvo ”liberalne CIA”. To je med drugim dokazal tudi leta 2014, v članku Sramežljivo spogledovanje EU-ja z bojkotom Izraela,28https://www.rtvslo.si/svet/sramezljivo-spogledovanje-eu-ja-z-bojkotom-izraela/342315 v katerem poleg omembe Sorosovih sredstev Tanje Fajon in Iva Vajgla, organizacije Oxfam (del ”liberalne CIA”), omenja in posredno citira tudi Richard Falka – 

»Da je bojkot Izraela popolnoma upravičen, meni tudi Richard Falk, ameriški posebni poročevalec ZN-a o položaju človekovih pravic na palestinskih ozemljih od leta 2008 do junija 2014, ki ga v svoji knjigi navaja Barghouti: “Kampanja civilne družbe, ki zahteva bojkot izraelskih uradnih institucij ali umik naložb iz podjetij, ki poslujejo v Izraelu, še posebej, če so na kakšen način povezana z zasedbo, je popolnoma primerna in tudi predstavlja državljansko dolžnost v podporo izvajanju mednarodnega prava.” Ob tem Pretnar iz BDS-ja pojasnjuje: “Če bi vlade spoštovale vse resolucije, ki so jih sprejeli Združeni narodi, bojkot in BDS sploh ne bi bila potrebna.”«29https://www.rtvslo.si/svet/sramezljivo-spogledovanje-eu-ja-z-bojkotom-izraela/342315

Richard Falk – vodilno pro-palestinsko sredstvo ”liberalne CIA”

Združenje dramskih umetnikov Slovenije

»”Novinarke in novinarji, urednice in uredniki se s svojim delom izkazujejo in izpostavljajo ne le kot posredniki vsakodnevnih informativnih sporočil, temveč udejanjajo želeni normativ predstavljanja temeljnih družbenih vsebin javnosti in oblikujejo zgled celostne usmerjenosti skupnosti,” je v izjavi za javnost v imenu Združenja dramskih umetnikov Slovenije zapisal njegov predsednik Boris Mihalj.«31https://www.rtvslo.si/kultura/oder/opozorilno-stavko-na-rtv-slovenija-podprlo-tudi-zdruzenje-dramskih-umetnikov-slovenije/629072

Slovenski center PEN

»V izjavi za javnost so zapisali, da smo javno Radiotelevizijo Slovenija s plačilom prispevka gradili vsi Slovenci in Slovenke ter ima ob informativni tudi pomembno znanstveno-kulturno vlogo v družbi, najbolj v duhu objektivne obveščenosti, ki je temelj demokratičnih odločitev državljanov in državljank.«32https://www.rtvslo.si/kultura/knjige/slovenski-center-pen-podprl-prizadevanja-stavkajocih-na-rtv-slovenija/628783

Mirovni Inštitut

»Po dveh letih zunanjih in notranjih pritiskov, postopkovnih kršitev, izigravanja in spreminjanja notranjih pravil zavoda, popolne vsebinske in programske degradacije javnega medija ter teptanja novinarske avtonomije zaposlenih pozdravljamo odločitev članic in članov sindikatov RTV, ki so prevzeli kolektivno odgovornost v skupnem boju za ohranitev javnega v slovenskem medijskem prostoru. Sodelavke in sodelavci Mirovnega inštituta zato izražamo vso podporo izglasovani opozorilni in solidarnostni stavki novinark_jev in ustvarjalk_cev na RTV Slovenija.
Dobre novinarke in novinarji, odgovorne urednice in uredniki, profesionalni in imaginativni pristopi k posredovanju vsebin, skrb za manjšine in kvaliteten program so zaradi predanosti medijskih ustvarjalk ter ustvarjalcev zavoda v zadnjih treh desetletjih žal postali preveč samoumevni. …
Stavka zato nikakor ni opustitev vsebinskih zahtev in programskih zavez do javnosti. Ravno nasprotno: stavka je prevzemanje zgodovinske odgovornosti do javnosti. Je kritična točka, ki lahko ponovno odpre debato o pomenu javnega in glasno opozorilo o nepovratnih destruktivnih procesih znotraj RTV, ki jih javnost, če se bo trenutno stanje nadaljevalo, kmalu ne bo mogla več odpraviti33https://www.mirovni-institut.si/izjava-podpore-stavki-na-rtv-slovenija/

Glavna financerja in partnerja od pro-globalističnega, pro-migrantskega in pro-LGBTQ inštituta sta Sorosova Open Society Foundations in European Commission, ki sta oba izjemno pomembna partnerja od National Endowment for Democracy. Mirovni inštitut je zelo tesno povezan z RTV Slovenija/MMC, prav tako pa je tesno povezan z National Endowment for Democracy. Dejansko je Mirovni Inštitut Sorosova (CIA) izpostava v Sloveniji.

Poročilo od Open Society Institute iz leta 2009, kjer je jasno in razločno zapisano, da je Mirovni inštitut skupaj z National Endowment for Democracy, Rockefeller Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Freedom House in International Republican Institute, skupni partner od Open Society Institute/Open Society Foundations

»Partnerships; Donor Partners: … United States Agency for International Development (USAID) … Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA), the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs Matra Programme, the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs FRESTA Programme, the German Foreign Ministry and Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), and a number of Austrian government agencies … Ford Foundation, United Nations Foundation, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Annie E. Casey Foundation, the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, the American Austrian Foundation, Freedom Forum, the Pew Charitable Trusts, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the Atlantic Philanthropies, the John S. and James L.Knight FoundationCarnegie Corporation of New York, the Lilly Endowment, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the Nathan Cummings Foundation, the Schumann Center for Media and Democracy, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Surdna Foundation, the Tides Foundation, and the German Marshall FundRobert Bosch Foundation, the King Baudouin Foundation, the Sigrid Rausing Trust, the Oak Foundation, the European Cultural Foundation, and some of the German political party-affiliated foundations … Freedom HouseNational Endowment for DemocracyEurasia FoundationInternational Republican Institute … Asia Foundation … Central European University in BudapestAmerican Civil Liberties Union Foundation William J. Brennan Jr. Center for Justice … Center for Community Change … Center for Global Development … Committee to Protect Journalists … Drug Policy AllianceEuropean Network Against RacismEuropean Roma Rights Center … Global Fund for Women … Global Witness … Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights … Human Rights Watch … Institute for International Education … International Center for Transitional Justice … International Crisis Group … Médecins Sans Frontières … New America FoundationPeace Institute in Slovenia … Policy Association for Open Society (PASOS) … Project Syndicate … Proteus Fund … Refugees International … The Tides Center … Transparency International.«34https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/uploads/2519658d-a95b-44bd-b9d3-edec9039de24/partners_20090720_0.pdf; str. 1-10

Radio Študent

Še eno slovensko radikalno sredstvo ”liberalne CIA” je Radio Študent, ki je točno tisto, kar v javnosti ”kritizira”.

»”Ta stavka je veliko upanje in luč, med mladimi novinarji nas mnogo tako misli,” je povedala Hana Radilovič z Radia Študent35https://www.rtvslo.si/slovenija/shod-za-javno-rtv-unicevanje-rtv-slovenija-se-mora-koncati/641654

Radio Študent je leta 2004 objavil članek Zakaj zahod podpira Viktorja Juščenka – 

»Juščenka in njegove organizirane privržence finančno podpirajo zahodne ambasade v Kijevu, USAID, Svetovna Banka, Mednarodni denarni sklad in ameriška organizacija The National Endowment for Democracy. Od vseh se še najbolj izplača izpostaviti slednjega. The National Endowment for DemocracyTa organizacija tako ni nič drugega kot civilna roka Cie in je bila skladno s tem doslej vpletena tudi v številne državne udare v Latinski Ameriki. NED danes financira Juščenkovo stranko Naša Ukrajina. Predvolilna kampanja je ujeta v vrtinec masovne propagande, diktirane s strani zahodnih institucij za stike z javnostjo, ki so v svetu znane predvsem po vsiljevanju tako imenovanega konsenza o ekonomskih in demokratičnih reformah. Ena izmed teh organizacij je ameriški republikanski inštitut z orwellovskim imenom Freedom House. Njegovi – recimo temu – svetovalci se trenutno nahajajo v Kijevu, od koder polnijo zahodni in ukrajinski medijski prostor s številnimi dezinformacijami in manipulacijami. Omenjene zahodne institucije se ne ukvarjajo zgolj z manipuliranjem javnega prostora, temveč na svojih prsih tudi dojijo razne tako imenovane prodemokratične in proreformistične mladinske organizacije, med katerimi je največja študentsko gibanje Pora, ki po svoji strukturi in dejavnostih močno spominja na srbski Otpor in gruzijsko Kmaro. Pora v svojih vrstah združuje okoli deset tisoč mladih nadobudnežev, eden izmed njihovih glavnih pokroviteljev pa je Sorošev Inštitut za odprto družbo. Spomnimo, ameriški milijarder George Soroš se v prenekaterih vzhodnoevropskih državah sooča z očitki, da svoje organizacije uporablja zgolj kot krinko, medtem ko v ozadju njegovega dobrodelništva ležijo veliki poslovni interesi, ki jih Soroš prikrito uveljevlja nato, ko na oblast pride ‘prodemokratični in proreformistični’ režim. … Trditev, da si zahod s podpiranjem Viktorja Juščenka prizadeva za demokracijo v Ukrajini, je absurdna36https://old.radiostudent.si/article.php?sid=5173

Radio Študent pa je bil med drugim že davnega leta 1997  tudi financer od 3. Mednarodnega festivala sodobnih umetnosti, katerega financerji so bili še – 

»Open Society Institute Macedonia … Sorosov center za sodobne umetnosti Ljubljana … Open Society Fund Prague …  MamaCash,Womens’s Funding Organization [del ”liberalne CIA”] … British Council … Radio Študent … Moderna galerija … K4 … Lesbo … Škuc LL.«37http://www.cityofwomen.org/sl/content/1997/kdo-je-kdo

V tem obdobju, med 1992 – 2000 pa je Soros tudi financer od Radia Študent, skupaj z ostalimi slovenskimi sredstvi ”liberalne CIA”.

V obdobju od novembra 2001 do konca maja 2002 je potekal na Mirovnem inštitutu 5. letnik Delavsko-punkerske univerze: Utopistika, katerega financer je bil Open Society Institute, medijski pokrovitelj pa je bil Radio Študent.38http://www2.arnes.si/~ljmiri1s/slo_html/dogodki/utopistike.htm

Radio Študent leta 2013 prenaša Dan za študentsko organiziranje, ki je prvotno program od Danes je nov dan – Inštitut za druga vprašanja, katerega ključni financer v današnjem obdobju je National Endowment for Democracy. Z Radio Študent pa tesno sodeluje še eno sredstvo slovenske ”liberalne CIA” in sicer Bogomir Kovač, katerega sin Martin Kovač je ”aktivist” ravno pri Danes je nov dan – Inštitut za druga vprašanja.

Branimir Štrukelj

Vodja stavkovnih zahtev od RTV Slovenija/MMC je bil kot predsednik od Konfederacije sindikatov javnega sektorja Slovenije Branimir Štrukelj, ki je prav tako tesno povezan z Mirovnim Inštitutom, revijo Mladina (promotor ”liberalne CIA”) in stranko Levica, kot tudi je bil predsednik in je član nadzornega sveta Modre zavarovalnice. Štrukelj je tudi podpiral ”petkove protestnike”, ki niso nič drugega, kot še ena sredstva ”liberalne CIA”.

Ni zanemarljivo dejstvo, da je Štrukelj preko svoje nekdanje žene tesno povezan z Milanom Kučanom, tesnim sodelavcem od CIA/Georga Sorosa in članom od Club de Madrid. Kučan leta 2002 na pobudo Mirovnega Inštituta podeli Sorosu častni znak svobode Republike Slovenije za njegove zasluge pri spodbujanju in razvijanju odprte demokratične in humane družbe v sodobnem svetu ter za zasluge pri uveljavljanju odprte, strpne in razsvetljene civilne družbe v Sloveniji. 

Boštjan Videmšek

Boštjan Videmšek je novinar revije Delo in avtor večkrat nagrajene ”okoljevarstvene” knjige Plan B. Za Blažem Zgago drugo vodilno slovensko medijsko sredstvo ”liberalne CIA”.

27.9.2022 – 

»Videmšek: Tisti, ki rušijo RTV, niso novinarstvo
“Ostanimo novinarstvo, ker tisti, ki rušijo RTV, to niso. To je edino, za kar se lahko borimo. Novinarji se za resnico, demokracijo in svobodo lahko borimo le s svojim delom zunaj območja udobja in zdaj smo in še dolgo bomo zunaj tega območja. S svojim delom se lahko neposredno spopadamo s tistimi, ki nas želijo ustaviti, zatorej nazaj k osnovam, k pisanju, snemanju in zgodbam, kjer nismo protagonisti, ali pa nas zasluženo ne bo več,” pa je za shod zapisal dolgoletni vojni poročevalec Boštjan Videmšek.«39https://www.rtvslo.si/slovenija/shod-za-javno-rtv-unicevanje-rtv-slovenija-se-mora-koncati/641654

Boštjan Videmšek je 19.1.2023 posredoval tvit od Deutsche Welle –

»DW Global Ideas & Environment@dw_environment
“The people who are mostly fueling the destruction of the planet…these are the people that we seem to rely on solving our problems.”

@GretaThunberg slams those gathered in Davos for the @wef annual meeting40https://twitter.com/dw_environment/status/1616108094848638976?cxt=HHwWgICxgf7vyO0sAAAA

Boštjan Videmšek je bil preko Mirovnega inštituta leta 2003 udeleženec konferenc in seminarjev iz omrežja SEENPM – 

»Januar – december: udeležba novinarjev iz Slovenije na seminarjih in konferencah mreže SEENPM: Dejan Ljubenovič, Pop TV, v Sofiji;  Jasna Preska, Radio Koper, v Sofiji; Barbara Sloj, 24ur.com, v Sofiji; Vanja Tekavec, Delo; in Lea Širok, TV Koper-Capodistria, v Sofiji; Andrej Stopar, Radio Slovenija, v Sofiji; Rina Klinar, Radio Jesenice; in Grega Repovž, Društvo novinarjev Slovenije, v Bukarešti; Polona Movrin, POP TV, v Sofiji; Boštjan Videmšek, Polet; in Alenka Kotnik, TV Slovenija, v Skopju 

Januar, oktober: udeležba na dveh sejah komisije za raziskovalne projekte mreže SEENPM
v Budimpešti in Kišinjevu
Februar: letna skupščina mreže SEENPM v Ljubljani
Maj–december: izbor in izvedba študijskega obiska pri Guardianu v Londonu za Boruta
Mekino, Večer, in Matijo Graha, Delo.
Junij: delavnica Mete Krese o foto-žurnalizmu v Ljubljani v okviru TOT sheme SEENPM
Julij–december: zagon in vodenje mednarodnega raziskovalnega projekta o medijskem
lastništvu v 17 državah, v okviru mreže SEENPM«41Mirovni inštitut, Letno vsebinsko poročilo
Mirovnega inštituta; str. 113

Financer Mirovnega inštituta leta 2003 je bila Sorosova Open Society Institute.42Ibid.

Financerji od leta 2000 ustanovljene South East European Network for Professionalization of the Media (SEENPM)  leta 2003 so bili Open Society Institute; danska FRESNA (financirana s strani danskega zunanjega ministrstva); in Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation.43http://www.seenpm.org/; dostop 19.10.2003

Videmšek je seveda vseskozi zelo tesen sodelavec Mirovnega inštituta (tesen partner od NED), ki je leta 2023 še vedno partnerska organizacija od SEENPM, katerega financerji v obdobju 2022/2023 so –

»National Endowment for DemocracyOpen Society FoundationsKonrad Adenauer StiftungEuropean Union … IFEX … Balkan Trust for Democracy. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) … Danish Govern­ment/International Media Support«44https://seenpm.org/founders/; dostop 27.1.2023

Tako je med drugim leta 2020 sodeloval pri predstavitvi zbornika Verige globalnega kapitalizma.

Leta 2016 se je Videmšek udeležil konference Youth Caucus45https://www.politico.eu/article/politico-youth-caucus-participants/ od vplivne revije Politico, ki je prav tako pomemben del tega obveščevalnega omrežja liberalnega establišmenta. Ustanovitelj revije je vplivna bankirska družina Allbritton, ki je tesno povezana s CIA, družino Bush, Obamovo administracijo, Savdskim princem Bandarjem in čilskim diktatorjem Pinochetom. Družina Allbritton je bila do leta 2005 glavni so-lastnik banke Riggs National Corporation, preko katere je prala denar za diktatorja Pinocheta,  Savdsko kraljevo družino in preko katere je princ Bandar financiral dva terorista udeležena v 9/11 in enega pomembnega simpatizerja Al-Qaede. Sedanji lastnik od Politico je Axel Springer, ki je prav tako tesno povezan s tem obveščevalnim omrežjem liberalnega establišmenta, med drugim preko Sun Van Valley Meetings.

Udeleženci konference so bili še

Videmšek je dobil leta 2019 € 11.995 za pro-migrantski projekt The Bottleneck of the Balkan Route s strani Journalism Fund. Sredstva so bila dodeljena preko programa European Cross-border Grants, katerega financerji leta 2019 so bili – 

»Open Society Foundations  [€]164.898 … Adessium Foundation [€]177.584«47https://www.journalismfund.eu/about-us-documents/funding; dostop 27.1.2023

Skupaj z Videmškom so pri projektu sodelovali še Nerminka Emrić; Mašenjka Bačić; Klara Škrinjar (Delo; Oštro – financiran s strani Rockefeller Brothers Fund, NED, Open Society Foundations);  Maja Čakarić (Oštro); Matej Povše. 

Z Journalism Fund, ki je del širšega omrežja ”liberalne CIA” in je hkrati del liberalnega establišmenta, pa istočasno tesno sodelujeta tudi Blaž Zgaga in Nataša Pirc Musar.

Videmškov pro-migrantski prispevek Go back to where you came from, je leta 2019 objavil portal Oštro,48https://www.ostro.si/en/stories/pushback-migrants-testimonies ki ga leta 2019 financirata Open Society Foundations v višini $25,000 in Slovensko ministrstvo za kulturo v višini €21,035. Oštro pa kot že omenjeno financiran še s strani Rockefeller Brothers Fund; National Endowment for Democracy; OCCRP; IJ4EU; European Journalism Center; in ostalih iz omrežja ”liberalne CIA”.49https://www.ostro.si/en/finances; dostop 27.1.2027

Videmšek je leta 2020 prejel nagrado Čuvaj/Watchdog, ki jo podeljuje Društvo novinarjev Slovenije. Dobitniki nagrade leta 2020 še Katarina Bulatović – Oštro (financiran s strani NED; Open Society Foundations);  Tadej Grešovnik – POP TV; Janko Petrovec -Televizija Slovenija; Špela Kuralt – Delo; Zarja Muršič – Radio Študent; Jožica Grgič – Delo.

9.12.2022 je Videmšek objavil tvit – 

»delo.si/sobotna-priloga/daniel-ellsberg-za-vedno-prvi-med-zvizgaci/ Moj portret Daniela Ellsberga, za vedno prvega žvižgača.«50https://twitter.com/bosthi/status/1601295864806313984?cxt=HHwWgMCoodyG-bgsAAAA

Daniel Ellberg je bil na začetku svoje kariere ultra-desničarsko sredstvo in je delal pod okriljem zloglasnega CIA operativca Teda Schackleyja v Vietnamu. Shackleyjeva skupina je bila tesno povezava s trgovino z drogami, oddelki smrti in atentati. Ellsberg je postal slaven leta 1971, ko je postal vpleten v Pentagon Papers, ter s tem postal doživljenjski prvak za levičarske socialistične cilje. Skratka, Ellsberg je kot CIA sredstvo, preko Pentagon Papers, pomagal prenesti krivdo iz CIA in vodilnih vpletenih v vietnamsko vojno in v trgovino z drogami, na vojsko, ter tako postal vodilno sredstvo in junak ”liberalne CIA”.

Krajša zgodba ozadja o Videmškovemu izmišljenemu super junaku Ellsbergu in o Pentagon Papers – 

»The House of Representatives launched deeper probes into CIA drug smuggling and the CIA’s Phoenix Program in early 1971, and, naturally, the CIA at this critical time took extensive countermeasures in a concerted effort to conceal these facts. What is relevant to the discrepancy is the that in June 1971, Daniel Ellsberg leaked the aptly named Pentagon Papers, shifting blame for the increasingly unpopular Vietnam War from the CIA to the military, while distracting public attention from the investigations of the CIA’s Phoenix Program and the CIA’s involvement in drug smuggling.«51https://www.counterpunch.org/2003/03/08/will-the-real-daniel-ellsberg-please-stand-up/

Daljša zgodba o Ellbergu Pentagon Papers – 

»Be forewarned: nowhere in this revisionist history will be audience be presented with the cast of Corsican drug smugglers and CIA agents that shaped Ellsberg’s sensibilities and sent him on his path to New Left notoriety. But as the reader shall see in this article, somewhere between the official Pentagon Papers story, and the CIA’s involvement in international drug trafficking, is a disturbing clash of facts from which Ellsberg will not emerge with his icon status intact. …

The first thing the reader needs to know is that Ellsberg was not always a pacifist “dove” intent on ending the Vietnam War. At first he was an aggressive “hawk.” His militant approach to the Cold War ? he was all for nuking the Soviet Union ? was shaped during a tour of duty as a Marine lieutenant, and precisely because of his hard-line attitude, and his ability to articulate it, he was offered a job as a Defense Department analyst.

Then in 1965 he was assigned as a Pentagon observer to the CIA’s Revolutionary Development (RD) Program in South Vietnam. Here Ellsberg came under the influence of his mentor, CIA officer cum Air Force General Edward Lansdale [CFR, 1959 – 1978; American Security Council]. The mass murderer Graham Greene used as the model for Alden Pyle in “The Quiet American,” Lansdale was the architect of the CIA’s anti-terror strategy for winning the Vietnam War. When not engaged in typical RD Program “Civil Affairs” activities, such as helping the local Vietnamese build perimeter defenses around their villages, Ellsberg and his fellow RD advisors, under the tutelage of Lansdale, dressed in black pajamas and reportedly slipped into enemy areas at midnight to “snatch and snuff” the local Viet Cong cadre, sometimes making it appear as if the VC themselves had done the dirty deed, in what Lansdale euphemistically called “black propaganda” activities

Functioning as a gruesome “shadow warrior” was not Ellsberg’s only claim to fame in South Vietnam. It will not be addressed in the TV docudrama, but Ellsberg was exceedingly charming and possessed with the uncanny ability to reproduce conversations verbatim–talents that made him a highly prized asset of John Hart, the CIA station chief in Saigon. Hart and the CIA’s foreign intelligence staff wanted to know what influential Vietnamese citizens and officials were privately thinking, and plotting, so they introduced Ellsberg into Saigon’s elite social circles, and he began reporting directly to station chief John Hart on matters of political importance.

And if what his CIA colleagues say is true, Ellsberg was not only as a superb spy, he was also as a swashbuckling swordsman who romanced numerous women, including the exquisite Germaine … heedless of the fact that she was engaged to an opium-addicted Corsican drug smuggler named Michel Seguin. … According to Professor McCoy, at the time Ellsberg met Germaine, Ellsberg’s close friend, CIA officer Lucien Conein, was negotiating a “truce” with the Corsican gangsters who supplied South Vietnam’s top military officers and government officials with that most lucrative of black market commodities, heroin.

Legendary CIA officer Lou Conein … returned to South Vietnam in 1954, as an aide to the aforementioned Ed Lansdale, to help organize the CIA’s anti-communist forces in North Vietnam. … Conein spent the next few years in the opium rich outlands of Iran as a military advisor to the Shah’s special forces. In 1962 he returned to Vietnam as a “floating emissary,” reporting directly to the Kennedy White House, while secretly coaching the cabal of generals that murdered President Diem and his opium-addicted brother Nhu on 2 November 1963. 

After the bloody coup d’etat, Conein remained in South Vietnam, but not without further controversy. As noted, professor McCoy contends that Ellsberg and Conein formed a fast friendship at the exact same moment Conein was arranging a “truce” between the CIA and unnamed Corsican drug smugglers in Saigon. … Here we return to enchantress Germaine, her opium-addicted Corsican fiance, Michel Seguin, a new character in our passion play, Frank Scotton. In 1965 Scotton was ostensibly employed by the U.S. Information Service, though his undercover job as a CIA officer was forming assassination squads around Saigon in what was the prototype of the CIA’s infamous Phoenix Program. Through this experimental “counter-terror” program, which fell under Lansdale’s RD Program, Scotton and Ellsberg met and became the best of friends. In fact, it was Scotton who invited Ellsberg to the party where the fateful encounter with Germaine occurred.

What happened next is subject to conjecture–and it must be emphasized that in order to understand how the Discrepancy might occur, the reader must need be aware that rumors, whisper campaigns, and half-truths are the preferred weapons of political warriors. CIA dirty tricks and deceptions are meant to misdirect and discredit, so one must examine these statements closely to discover what is being concealed, and why. Complicating the already convoluted situation is the fact that Ellsberg’s closest friends, Lou Conein and Frank Scotton, were CIA officers. Which is not meant to cast guilt through association on Ellsberg, but it is intended to warn the reader that one must carefully study their conflicting stories.

Scotton and Conein, in separate interviews with this writer, claimed they warned Ellsberg to sever his relationship with Germaine. But Ellsberg, they said, would not be kept from his lover’s embrace. Scotton and Conein claimed that Michael Seguin hired a Vietnamese assassin to kill Ellsberg, but, they said, they were able to intercept the assassin before he could carry out his contract.

In an interview with this writer, Ellsberg admitted to having had the affair with Germaine, and he confessed that Seguin put a gun to his head and warned him to stay away from the woman they both cherished. But Ellsberg vehemently denied that either Scotton or Conein intervened on his behalf. Their stories, he said, were standard CIA disinformation, designed to make him seem beholden to former CIA comrades, and thus cast doubt on his motives for leaking The Pentagon Papers.

… And in a search of the recorded history of the time, there is only one source that sheds any light on the situation. All we know, according to Professor McCoy, is that CIA agent Lou Conein met with Corsican gangsters to arrange a “truce” regarding drug smuggling in South Vietnam, and that after this “truce” the Corsicans (including, one would presume, Michel Seguin) continued to serve as “contact men” for the CIA in the drug smuggling business.

This is where The Discrepancy reaches critical mass, for Ellsberg denies that his CIA mentor, Edward Lansdale, or his CIA friends, Lou Conein and Frank Scotton, were involved with Corsican drug smugglers.

Recapping: McCoy claims that Conein arranged a” truce” with the Corsican gangsters over drug smuggling in South Vietnam; Conein denied the allegation and said the meeting concerned Ellsberg’s affair with Germaine; and Ellsberg denies (1) that Conein and Scotton intervened on his behalf, and (2) that Conein, Lansdale and Scotton were involved with drug smugglers.

Who is telling the truth? Could a CIA officer with a photographic memory not be aware that his colleagues were involved with drug smugglers? Or is McCoy’s research fatally flawed? Did the alleged “truce” occur? Was the good professor, who has prompted so many people to question the CIA’s role in international drug smuggling, misled by dirty trickster Conein. Was the ulterior motive to move McCoy toward the Corsicans and away from the CIA’s unilateral drug smuggling operation? Thinking the Unthinkable.

It was 1970 when the mainstream American press first reported the CIA’s involvement in international drug trafficking, and it was 1970 when the U.S. Senate launched a potentially explosive investigation into the CIA’s Phoenix “assassination” Program, a special unit of which was providing security for the CIA’s unilateral drug smuggling operation.

The House of Representatives launched deeper probes into CIA drug smuggling and the CIA’s Phoenix Program in early 1971, and, naturally, the CIA at this critical time took extensive countermeasures in a concerted effort to conceal these facts. What is relevant to the discrepancy is the that in June 1971, Daniel Ellsberg leaked the aptly named Pentagon Papers, shifting blame for the increasingly unpopular Vietnam War from the CIA to the military, while distracting public attention from the investigations of the CIA’s Phoenix Program and the CIA’s involvement in drug smuggling.

Ellsberg is aware of the rumor that Conein and Scotton asked him to leak the Pentagon Papers as part of the CIA’s disinformation campaign. But he shrugs off the insidious rumor as yet another instance of  CIA disinformation designed to cast doubt on his motives for leaking The Pentagon Papers.

While it is definitely politically incorrect within what passes nowadays for the New Left to even make the suggestion, is it unthinkable that Ellsberg might have suffered such a whisper campaign in order to prevent his CIA friends from being indicted for drug smuggling and mass murder?

After Ellsberg leaked The Pentagon Papers, the CIA’s plot to cover-up its unilateral drug smuggling operation moved forward with greater gusto. According to the Justice Department’s still classified DeFeo Report, Conein in the spring of 1971 was called out of retirement by CIA officer E. Howard Hunt and asked to become an advisor to President Nixon’s “drug czar” (and Plumber) Egil Krogh, on matters regarding “problems of narcotic control in Southeast Asia and the Pentagon Papers.”

Consider that in 1971 the relationship between the French intelligence service and Corsican drug smugglers in its employ was exposed after a series of spectacular drug busts made in America with the assistance of the CIA. Concurrently, Conein was called out of retirement and immediately, in June 1971, told McCoy about the “truce” with the French-connected Corsicans, one of who put a gun to Ellsberg head.

Consider also that Egil Krogh’s investigators stumbled upon the CIA’s unilateral drug smuggling operation at this time, and that in July 1971, President Nixon declared the burgeoning war on drugs to be a matter of national security. Nixon went after the CIA and quick as a flash, E. Howard Hunt (Conein’s comrade from OSS Detachment 202) bungled the bugging of the Watergate Hotel. Washington Post reporter and former Naval Intelligence officer Bob Woodward, then assigned to cover Nixon’s war on drugs, was approached by the still anonymous Deep Throat, and based on unsubstantiated rumors, incrementally engendered the Watergate scandal and effectively neutralized Nixon, and his war on drugs.

In the summer of 1972 came the publication of McCoy’s book, which implicated the CIA in Corsican drug smuggling operation in Thailand, Vietnam, Burma and Laos. But no CIA officer was ever indicted for drug smuggling. In fact, the CIA boasted that it was actually helping, by infiltrating the Corsican operation, to wage the war on drugs. Amazing as it may sound, McCoy’s exposure in 1972 of the French Connection drug smuggling operation also helped to divert public attention from the CIA’s unilateral drug smuggling operations.

That same summer of 1972, Lou Conein became a consultant to the newly created Office of National Narcotics Intelligence (ONNI) at the Department of Justice. After the Drug Enforcement Administration was formed in July 1973, Conein became chief of a special operations unit that in 1975 was investigated by the U.S. Senate for the dubious distinction of assassinating drug lords.«52https://www.counterpunch.org/2003/03/08/will-the-real-daniel-ellsberg-please-stand-up/

Ellsberg je hkrati tesen prijatelj od Mortona Halperina, ki je bil so-avtor od Pentagon Papers in še eden super elitnih predstavnikov ”liberalne CIA”. Dovolj je zgovoren podatek, da je Halperin od leta 1969 dalje član od Council on Foreign Relations, katerega član je tudi Ellsbergov CIA general Edward Lansdale iz Vietnama. Od leta 2002 pa je Halperin tesen sodelavec Georga Sorosa pri Open Society Foundations.

Leta 2008 je Ellsberg z  vodilnimi sredstvi ”liberalne CIA”, kot sta Noamom Chomskyim, top antifa Howardom Zinnom in ostali, pomagal (dezinformirati javnost) reševati Albert Einstein Institute in Genea Sharpa, zaradi obtožb o njihovem pomembnem sodelovanja pri t.i. mehkih CIA državnih udarih. Pri tem pranju možganov javnosti, je sodelovalo celotno omrežje ”new left” ”pregresivcev”, preko omrežja ”aktivistov” in medijev. AEI pri pripravi državnih udarov tesno sodeluje z omrežjem, ki ga na eni strani oblikujejo Kissingerjev/CIA Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Belfer Center for Sciene and International Affairs in International Center for Nonviolent Conflict od Petra Ackermana (Freedom House) na Fletcher School for Law and Democracy. Na drugi strani pa to isto omrežje dopolnjujejo (če izvzamemo Council on Foreign Relations, ki je dejansko center vseh teh operacij) National Endowment for Democracy, National Democratic Institute, International Republican Institute, Freedom House, U.S. Institute of Peace, Open Society Foundations, in ostali. Te metode, ki so se uspešno razvijale preko srbske CIA skupine CANVAS in ”arabske pomladi”, so se prenesle na ”okoljevarstvene” skupine in posameznike, kot so Extinction Rebellion, Greta Thunberg in ostali iz tega omrežja ”liberalne CIA”.

V sklopu tega globalnega dezinformiranja javnosti, leta 2012 nastane Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF), katerega ustanovitelji so Daniel Ellsberg, John Perry Barlow (Electronic Frontier Foundation) in Rainey Ratman (Bradley Manning Support Network; Internet Defense League). Člani uprave pa so prav tako vodilna sredstva ”liberalne CIA”, kot so – direktor Edward Snowden, 2014 – ; Glenn Greenwald (The Guardian; The Intercept); Laura Poitras; John Cusacks; Micah Lee (The Intercapt; Electronic Frontier Foundation). Freedom of the Press Foundation zagotavlja finančna sredstva za Wikileaks.

Fundacija nastane kot program nepovratnih sredstev od Foundation for National Progress, ki je publicist od revije Mother Jones (del ”liberalne CIA”). Financerji od Mother Jones leta 2012, ko je ustanovljen FPF – 

»$10,000+ … 11th Hour Projcet [Eric Schmidt] … Craiglist Charitable FundLannan FoundationOverbrook Foundation. Park FoundationLaurene Powell Jobs Susan and Nicholas PritzkerAbby Rockefeller. Rockefeller Philanthropy AdvisorsSan Francisco FoundationSchumann Center for Media and DemocracySurdna Foundation … $1,5000 – $4,999: … Ploughshares Foud«53Mother Jones, Annual Report 2012, str. 35 – 37

Financerji in partnerske organizacije od FPF leta 2020 so vodilne fundacije in medijske organizacije ”liberalne CIA” –

»Committee to Protect Journalists. Craig Newmark PhilanthropiesThe Ford FoundationJohn S. and James L. Knight Foundation. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation … The Omidyar Group … Wellspring Philanthropic Fund«54FPF, 2020 Impact Report; str. 17

Financerji in partnerske organizacije od FPF leta 2018 –

»Committee to Protect Journalists. Craig Newmark Philanthropies. Digital Defense Fund. DuckDuckGo. Edward Snowden. First Look Media [Pierre Omidyar] Ford FoundationMozilla FoundationOpen Society Foundations. Private Internet Access«55FPF, 2018 Annual Report; str. 12

Društvo novinarjev Slovenije

»“Očitno je, da vodstvo posega po sredstvih izčrpavanja. Želijo in upajo, da bodo novinarke in novinarji odnehali ter se podredili pritiskom, kar se ne sme zgoditi, saj bi bilo s tem poteptano poslanstvo javne RTV,” pa je pojasnil član upravnega odbora Društva novinarjev Slovenije (DNS) Gašper Andrinek56https://www.rtvslo.si/slovenija/shod-za-javno-rtv-unicevanje-rtv-slovenija-se-mora-koncati/641654

Društvo novinarjev Slovenije je povezano z – 

»Achelis and Bodman Foundations [del ”konservativne CIA”] … Arnold Ventures. The Associated Press … Bank of America Charitable Foundation … Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation … Blavatnik Family Foundation … Bloomberg LP. BNY Mellon Charitable Gift Fund … Tom Brokaw … CBS News … Citi … CNN … Craig Newmark Philanthropies … David Geffen Foundation … Debevoise & Plimpton, LLP. Die Zeit … Discovery Communications, Inc. Disney-ABC Television Group … Dow Jones Company … Richard Edelman [Edelman Intelligence] … Emerson Collective LLC [Laurene Powell Jobs] … Facebook [Peter Thiel – CIA] … First Look Media [Pierre Omidyar] … Forbes Inc. Ford Foundation … Gannett Foundation … Heising-Simons Foundation … Hollywood Foreign Press Association … J.M. Kaplan Fund [CIA] … John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. John S. & James L. Knight Foundation … McKinsey & Company Inc. … MSNBC … NBA. NBC … New York Post. The New York Times Company …  Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard … Open Society Foundations … Overbrook Foundation  … Norman Pearlstine Pritzker Pucker Family Foundation … Robert R. McCormick Foundation … San Francisco Foundation … Silicon Valley Community Foundation … Sony Corporation of America … Carl & Barbara Lee SpielvogelA.G. Sulzberger … The Intercept [Pierre Omidyar] … Thomson Reuters. Tides FoundationTwitter Inc. UBS Financial Services Inc. … Viacom Inc. … Darren Walker [Ford Foundation] … Walt Disney Company Foundation … The Washington Post [Jeff Bezos – CIA] … Jacob Weisberg [CFR; ”anti-establišment”] … Wolfensohn Family Foundation [James Wolfensohn – CFR; Rockefeller Foundation]«57CPJ, Annual Report 2021; str. 26 – 29

»Naši partneri … Fund for an Open SocietyUSAID [financer od NED] … European Endowment for DemocracyFree Press Unlimited … IREX [financerji – Open Society Foundations; USAID] … Visegrad Fund [tesen partner od NED] … Council of EuropeBalkan Trust for Democracy [financerji – Rockefeller Foundation; Open Society Foundation; USAID] … SIDABalkan Civil Society Development Network [financerji – Rockefeller Brothers Fund; Open Society Foundations; USAID]«58https://nuns.rs/; dostop 27.1.2023

Sindikat novinarjev Slovenije

»Spregovorila je tudi predsednica Sindikata novinarjev Slovenije Alenka Potočnik, ki je poudarila: “Skupaj smo močnejši in se borimo, da nam ne bodo vzeli pravice do obveščenosti, informiranja in demokracije.” Dodala je, da si bodo morali novinarji sami izboriti tisto, kar pripada vsem Slovenkam in Slovencem, torej javno televizijo, kolegom na RTV-ju pa je izrekla tudi podporo vseh novinarskih sindikatov, ki podpirajo stavko.«59https://www.rtvslo.si/slovenija/shod-za-javno-rtv-unicevanje-rtv-slovenija-se-mora-koncati/641654

Sindikat novinarjev Slovenije ima povezave do –

Tuji podporniki ”stavke” in referenduma o RTV Slovenija

Tuji podporniki ’’stavke’’ zaposlenih na RTV Slovenija in hkrati podporniki referenduma, prihajajo iz omrežja ’’liberalne CIA’’. Najvidnejši in najpogostejši financerji nevladnih organizacij, ki se podpisujejo pod to vrsto peticij, so CIA-jina National Endowment for Democracy, Sorosova Open Society Foundation, Ford Foundation in ostali iz omrežja ’’liberalne CIA’’. To se tudi sklada s financerji ’’protestnikov’’ v Sloveniji. Prav tako pa se sklada in je koordinirano s pozivi raznih poslancev evropskega parlamenta, ki prav tako delujejo v tem omrežju, da je potrebno RTV Slovenija ’’depolitizirati’’. Tako je Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR), katerega vodilni financer je European Commission,60https://www.mfrr.eu/; dostop 22.12.2022 je objavil pismo v podporo reforme RTV Slovenija –

»Slovenia: Media freedom groups back legislative efforts to depoliticise public media.
Reform aimed at limiting political interference over RTV SLO faces upcoming referendum challenge.
The undersigned international media freedom and journalists’ organisations today outline their tentative support for reform of the law on Radiotelevizija Slovenija (RTV SLO) and the urgent need to depoliticise the public service media and their oversight bodies amidst continued threats to their independence. Our organisations welcome the initiative of the new coalition government to reduce the influence of politics on the broadcaster’s operations and foster an enabling climate for its public service mission.
Events of the last few years at RTV SLO have provided a clear illustration of why such changes are urgently needed. Under the previous government, leading politicians created an atmosphere of hostility towards public service media, including smears against journalists and aggressive accusations of political bias, as reflected by the 2021 mission report of the undersigned organizations and Slovenia’s fall to 54th place in Reporters Without Borders’ 2022 World Press Freedom Index. This was accompanied by politicised appointments to RTV SLO’s programming council and supervisory board, on occasion through legal yet questionable practices. Politically-affiliated appointees to these two bodies then utilised voting majorities to approve controversial decisions on staffing and programming favourable to the ruling SDS party, particularly at the public television. These appointments of often unqualified candidates or individuals with links to the former government were pushed through despite the widespread criticism. …
While concerns over independence in management are nothing new, the changes enacted under the previous government have left the broadcaster in the most challenging situation in decades. We therefore welcome the legislative initiative by the new coalition government led by Prime Minister Robert Golob to address this extraordinary situation.
Signed by:
Balkan Free Media Initiative (BFMI)
European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
European Federation of Journalists
Free Press Unlimited (FPU)
International Press Institute (IPI)
Public Media Alliance (PMA)
Reporters Without Borders (RSF)
OBC Transeuropa (OBCT)«61https://www.mfrr.eu/tag/slovenia/; dostop 21.12.2022

Zaključek

Medij (RTV/MMC), ki naj bi bil središče slovenskega osveščanja in objektivnega informiranja javnosti, kar je osnova demokratične družbe, je tako v rokah slovenske ”elite” preko liberalnega establišmenta, postal vodilni center pranja možganov in manipuliranja slovenske javnosti. Za to so odgovorni vodstvo od RTV, uredniki na RTV, številni ”novinarji” na RTV, vse politične stranke in še marsikdo drug. Vsi odgovorni bi morali zato tudi kazensko in finančno odgovarjati, kar pa se ne bo zgodilo, ker je pravni sistem v rokah istih ljudi, ki so v ozadju tega manipuliranja. Prav tako kader na RTV/MMC, ki se mu reče novinarji, v glavnem prihaja iz FDV in podobnih družboslovnih fakultet, ki so prav tako podvržene enakemu manipuliranju in pranju možganov preko raznih profesorjev.


Viri –

Čas branja 149 minut


Uvod

Kot je dejal leta 1991 Allen Weinstein, ki je so-ustanovitelj od National Endowment for Democracy (NED) –

»[T]he National Endowment for Democracy (NED) was created in 1983, ostensibly as a non-profit-making organisation to promote human rights and democracy. In 1991 its first president, the historian Allen Weinstein, confessed to The Washington Post: “A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA”.«1https://mondediplo.com/2007/08/04ned

Philip Agee, ex-CIA o CIA in NED –

»“The CIA used known American foundations, as well as other custom-made entities that existed only on paper.” The funded organisations sometimes managed to weaken and even eliminate opposition to friendly governments, while creating a climate favourable to US interests. There were coups, such as the one in Brazil in 1964 that overthrew President João Goulart. The coup against Chilean president Salvador Allende in 1973 [Rockefeller, Kissinger & Co.] showed that the US government had not abandoned such methods. Agee claimed: “To prepare the ground for the military, we funded and channelled the forces of leading organisations in civil society and the media. It was an improved version of the coup in Brazil.”«2Ibid.

»Nowadays, instead of having the CIA going around behind the scenes and trying to manipulate the process by inserting money here and giving instructions secretly and so forth, they have now a sidekick, which is this National Endowment for Democracy, NED« 

Frances Stonor Saunders o NED –

»The NED is the umbilical cord of gold that leads directly back to Washington … And by this I’m not only referring to official U.S. government programmes, but to the vast network of clandestine players that plan and enact its information warfare operations. The cultural Cold War has never gone away, it’s just shifted from target to target

Ključne fundacije, ki so pred ustanovitvijo od NED delovale in še vedno delajo pod krinko od CIA, so vodilne fundacije ”liberalne CIA”, kot so Rockefeller Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Ford Foundation, Carnegie Corporation of New York, Asia Foundation, ter danes manj pomemben J. M. Kaplan Fund. Med bolj znanimi v tistem obdobju pa so danes javnosti skoraj neznane fundacije in skladi, kot so Farfield Foundation, Hoblitzelle Foundation, Littauer Foundation, Price Fund, Rabb Charitable Foundation, Vernon Fund, Whitney Trust, Fleischmann Foundation, Holmes Foundation, Shelter Rock Foundation, Gardner Cowles Foundation, Fred Lazarus Foundation, Gotham Foundation, Beacon Fund, Edsel Fund in Borden Trust. Nekatere med njimi so delovale samo kot poštni naslov, preko katerega so kanalizirali denar od CIA v naprej določene legitimne fundacije. Ta sistem deluje še danes na podoben način, le, da so CIA v večji meri nadomestile fundacije raznih novodobnih milijarderjev, ki delajo za to isto staro obveščevalno omrežje.

»The use of philanthropic foundations was the most convenient way to pass large sums of money to Agency projects without alerting the recipients to their source. By the mid 1950s, the CIA’s intrusion into the foundation field was massive. Although figures are not available for this period, the general counsel of a 1952 Congress committee appointed to investigate US foundations concluded that ‘An unparalleled amount of power is concentrated increasingly in the hands of an interlocking and self-perpetuating group. … In 1976, a Select Committee appointed to investigate US intelligence activities reported on the CIA’s penetration of the foundation field by the mid-1960s: during 1963-6, of the 700 grants over $10,000 given by 164 foundations, at least 108 involved partial or complete CIA funding. More importantly, CIA funding was involved in nearly half the grants made by these 164 foundations in the field of international activities during the same period.
‘Bona fide’ foundations such as Ford, Rockefeller and Carnegie were considered ‘the best and most plausible kind of funding cover’. A CIA study of 1966 argued that this technique was ‘particularly effective for democratically run membership organizations, which need to assure their own unwitting members and collaborators, as well as their hostile critics, that they have genuine, respectable, private sources of income’. Certainly, it allowed the CIA to fund ‘a seemingly limitless range of covert action programs affecting youth groups, labor unions, universities, publishing houses, and other private institutions’ from the early 1950s. … The criss-cross of money filtered its way through a raft of host foundations, some acting as fronts, some as conduits. Known to have wittingly facilitated CIA funding ‘passes’ were over 170 foundations «3Frances S. Saunders (1999). The Cultural War. New York: The New Press. Str. 82

V grobem so centri tega obveščevalnega/dezinformativnega/ manipulativnega sistema, kamor so umestili novo ustanovljeni National Endowment for Democracy Council on Foreign Relations, CIA, Rockefeller Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Ford Foundation (z vodilnimi Rockefellerjevimi možmi v upravi) in Rockefellerjeva Chase Manhattan Bank (Trilateral Commission) – 

»The Rockefeller Foundation, no less than the Ford, was an integral component of America’s Cold War machinery. … [Also] Rockefeller Brothers Fund Inc., major think-tank which was incorporated in New York in 1940. In 1957 the fund brought together the most influential minds of the period under a Special Studies Project whose task was to attempt a definition of American foreign policy. Subpanel II was designated to the study of International Security Objectives and Strategy, and its members included Henry [CFR, 1934 – 1966] and Clare Booth Luce [Henry Luce Foundation], Laurence Rockefeller, Townsend Hoopes [CFR, 1951 – 2004] (representing Jock Whitney’s company), Nelson Rockefeller [CFR, 1938 – 1978], Henry Kissinger [CFR, 1956 – ], Frank Lindsay [CFR, 1948 – 2011] and William Bundy [CFR, 1960 – 2000] of the CIA.

The convergence between the Rockefeller billions and the US government exceeded even that of the Ford Foundation. John Foster Dulles [CFR, 1922 – 1958] and later Dean Rusk [CFR, 1952 – 1994] both went from the presidency of the Rockefeller Foundation to become secretaries of state. Other Cold War heavies such as John J. McCloy [CFR, 1940 – 1988] and Robert A. Lovett [CFR, 1927 – 1940] featured prominently as Rockefeller trustees. Nelson Rockefeller’s central position on this foundation guaranteed a close relationship with US intelligence circles: he had been in charge of all intelligence in Latin America during the Second World War. Later, his associate in Brazil, Colonel J. C. King, became CIA chief of clandestine activities in the western hemisphere. When Nelson Rockefeller was appointed by Eisenhower to the National Security Council in 1954, his job was to approve various covert operations. If he needed any extra information on CIA-activities, he could simply ask his old friend Allen Dulles [CFR, 1927 – 1968] for a direct briefing. One of the most controversial of these activities was the CIA’s MK-ULTRA (or ‘Manchurian Candidate’) programme of mind-control research during the 1950s. This research was assisted by grants from the Rockefeller Foundation. … As important as Nelson Rockefeller was his brother, David [Rockefeller]. He controlled the donations committee of the Chase Manhattan Bank Foundation, was vice-president then president of the bank itself, a trustee of the Council on Foreign Relations, chairman of the Executive Committee for International House, and a close personal friend of Allen Dulles and Tom Braden [CFR, 1950 – 1975]. ‘I often briefed David, semi-officially and with Allen’s permission, on what we were doing,’ recalled Braden. ‘He was of the same mind as us, and very approving of everything we were doing.«4Ibid. Str. 87 – 88

Skozi to Rockefellerjevo ”filantropsko” obveščevalno omrežje, je bil leta 1983 ustanovljen NED, da bi preko zasebnega in ’’nevladnega’’ delovanja, podpiral ’’demokratične’’ ustanove in ”človekove pravice” po celem svetu. Čeprav se NED naslavlja kot nevladna, je to mit, tako kot to velja za veliko večino t. i. nevladnih organizacij, ki so v resnici samo krinka znotraj širšega obveščevalnega omrežja liberalnega establišmenta. Še posebno pa to velja za NED, ki deluje kot orodje od CIA/Council on Foreign Relations  preko State Departmenta.

Pod NED delujejo njegovi štirje ključni podporni stebri, ki se imenujejo – National Democratic Institute (NDI), International Republican Institute (IRI), American Center for International Labor Solidarity (ACIL) in Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE). Preko ACIL deluje eden vodilnih ameriških sindikatov AFL-CIO, ki je skozi celotno zgodovino tesno povezan s CIA in njenim proti-delavskim delovanjem. CIPE pa je zelo tesno povezan z U.S. Chamber of Commerce in njenimi pod-vejami, med drugim tudi v Sloveniji preko AmCham Slovenija. Te organizacije nato kanalizirajo denar od CIA, ameriške vlade, korporacij in fundacij, do drugih organizacij v ZDA in drugje po svetu.

NED se na različne načine, direktno ali posredno, vmešava v notranje zadeve številnih drugih držav – z dostavljanjem finančnih sredstev, tehničnega znanja, usposabljanja, dostavljanja izobraževalnih materialov, faksov, fotokopirnih strojev, avtomobilov, itd. – raznim izbranim političnim skupinam, civilnim organizacijam, delavskim sindikatom, disidentskim gibanjem, študentskim skupinam, knjižnim založbam, časopisom in medijem. NED nadaljuje točno to, kar je delala CIA prikrito pred tem.

Kot pravi ’’anti-CIA’’ in ’’anti-NED’’ avtor William Blum, ki je sicer sam ”anti-establišment” in ’’socialistično’’ sredstvo ’’liberalne CIA’’ –

»NED programs generally impart the basic philosophy that working people and other citizens are best served under a system of free enterprise, class cooperation, collective bargaining, minimal government intervention in the economy, and opposition to socialism in any shape or form. A free-market economy is equated with democracy, reform, and growth; and the merits of foreign investment in their economy are emphasized.
From 1994 to 1996, NED awarded 15 grants, totaling more than $2,500,000, to the American Institute for Free Labor Development, an organization used by the CIA for decades to subvert progressive labor unions. AIFLD’s work within Third World unions typically involved a considerable educational effort very similar to the basic NED philosophy described above. The description of one of the 1996 NED grants to AIFLD includes as one its objectives: “build union-management cooperation”. Like many things that NED says, this sounds innocuous, if not positive, but these in fact are ideological code words meaning “keep the labor agitation down … don’t rock the status-quo boat”. The relationship between NED and AIFLD very well captures the CIA origins of the Endowment.
NED has funded centrist and rightist labor organizations to help them oppose those unions which were too militantly pro-worker. This has taken place in France, Portugal and Spain amongst many other places. In France, during the 1983-4 period, NED supported a “trade union-like organization for professors and students” to counter “left-wing organizations of professors”. To this end it funded a series of seminars and the publication of posters, books and pamphlets such as “Subversion and the Theology of Revolution” and “Neutralism or Liberty”. (“Neutralism” here refers to being unaligned in the cold war.) …
As described in the “Elections” and “Interventions” chapters, NED successfully manipulated elections in Nicaragua in 1990 and Mongolia in 1996; helped to overthrow democratically elected governments in Bulgaria in 1990 and Albania in 1991 and 1992; and worked to defeat the candidate for prime minister of Slovakia in 2002 who was out of favor in Washington. And from 1999 to 2004, NED heavily funded members of the opposition to President Hugo Chavez [tesno povezan z vodilnimi Rockefellerjevimi sredstvi ’’liberalne CIA’’, tudi temi, s katerimi je tesno povezan Blum] in Venezuela to subvert his rule and to support a referendum to unseat him5https://williamblum.org/chapters/rogue-state/trojan-horse-the-national-endowment-for-democracy

Sam William Blum je postal širše medijsko prepoznaven, ko je Osama bin Laden (CIA in Savdsko sredstvo) leta 2006 izjavil, da bi morali vsi prebrati njegovo knjigo Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s Only Superpower. Dovolj zgovoren je podatek, da v Blumov ozki krog ljudi spadajo vodilna sredstva ”liberalne CIA”, kot so Ramsey Clark, Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn in Michael Parenti.

NED je v času globalizma, po padcu berlinskega zidu, vodilni financer ’’liberalne CIA’’ oz. (radikalnih in skrajnih) levičarjev, kot tudi raznih radikalnih muslimanskih posameznikov in skupin, po celem svetu. To financiranja skrajno levičarskih skupin je izjemno lepo razvidno tudi v primeru Slovenije in MMC RTV Slovenija, kjer so (”anti-Janša”) organizacije in mediji, ki jih financira NED, tesno povezane s strankami Levica, SD, SAB in Svoboda. Vzporedno s tem, pa sta seveda tudi stranki SDS in NSi tesno povezani z omrežjem od NED. 

Allen Weinstein

Allen Weinstein je bil za časa Reaganove administracije so-ustanovitelj od NED in bil vršilec dolžnosti predsednika. Od leta 1968-1969 in od 1971-1972 se je dodatno izobraževal kot elitni Fulbright Scholar, ter bil Fellow in kasneje še upravitelj od Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Njegovo tesno povezanost z liberalnim establišmentom in varnostno državo potrjuje tudi dejstvo, da je bil leta 1981 za krajši čas član uredniške skupine pri Washington Post, ter tudi od leta 1981 do 1983 izvršni urednik od The Washington Quarterly, ki ga je ustanovil s CIA in s Pentagonom tesno povezani Center for Strategic and International Studies.

National Strategy Information Center –

Weinstein je bil član od leta 1979 ustanovljenega Consortium for the Study of Intelligence, ki je bil projekt od National Strategy Information Center, kateri spada v omrežje ”konservativne CIA”. Člani projekta so bili še Richard Betts (CFR, 1978 – ), Richard Bissell Jr. (CFR, 1953 – ) – CIA, Ray S. Cline (CFR, 1974 – ) – CIA, Samuel P. Huntington (CFR, 1964 – ), Myers McDougal (CFR, 1953 – ), John M. Moore (CFR, 1974 – ), Robert Pfaltzgraff (CFR, 1974 – ), Richard Pipes (CFR, 1978 – ), Antonin Scalia, Frank Tragger (CFR, 1955 –), James Q. Wilson (CFR, 1981 – ). Kot je razvidno, so bili v veliki večini vsi člani tesno povezani s Council on Foreign Relations, katerega predsedujoči je bil tedaj David Rockefeller. National Strategy Information Center, ki je nastal leta 1962, je tudi tesno povezan s CIA. Ustanovitelj je bil kasnejši direktor od CIA William Casey, ki je bil član od CFR od leta 1973 dalje, ter močno vpleten v razne škandale, med drugim v Iran Contra, v financiranje afganistankih Mudžahedinov s pranjem heroinskega denarja preko zloglasne banke BCCI, katere ustanovitelj je bil Agha Hasan Abedi. Direktorji centra so bili tudi Prescott Bush Jr., brat od Georga H. W. Busha; Roy Godson (predsednik od 1993 -); Karl R. Bendetsen; Admiral Thomas H. Moorer (American Security Council). Člani svetovalnega odbora leta 1984 so bili Henry Fowler (CFR, 1950 – ); Joseph Coors (American Security Council); John W. Hanes, Jr. (CFR, 1955 –); Adolf W. Schmidt (predsednik od A. W. Mellon Educational and Charitable Trust; CFR, 1955 –); Frederick Seitz (predsednik od Rockefeller University, 1968-1978; CFR, 1970 – ); Laurence H. Silberman (CFR, 1970 – ); Admiral Elmo R. Zumwalt, Jr. (American Security Council). Član direktorske uprave centra leta 2006 je bil tudi pomembni sindikalni vodja Jay Mazur, ki je član od Council on Foreign Relations (1987 – ), bil član od Trilateral Commission, bil izvršni direktor od AFL-CIO (del ”liberalne CIA”), upravitelj od Freedom House (del ”konservativne CIA”). Mazur je bil tudi direktor od American Institute for Free Labor Development (AIFLD), ki je spadal pod AFL-CIO in bil tesno povezan s CIA, njegov namen pa je bil spodkopavati vpliv tujih sindikatov. AIFLD je nastal preko financiranja od National Endowment for Democracy, preko katerega je v 80ih prejemal denar, kasneje pa je bil financiran v glavnem preko USAID. Direktorji pri AIFLD so bili vodje sindikalnih organizacij, ki so danes tesno povezane z ”liberalno CIA”. Predsednik od AIFLD leta 1992 je bil Lane Kirkland, ki je bil od leta 1973 član od Council on Foreign Relations; bil član uprave od NED; bil upravitelj od Rockefeller Foundation; bil član od Brookings Institution; bil član od Carnegie Endowment for International Peace; bil član od American-Israel Friendship League (ustanovitelja Nelson Rockefeller in Henry Jackson); bil predsednik od AFL-CIO (1979 – 1995); in leta 1999 prejemnik NED Democracy Service Medal.

The Center for Democracy –

Leta 1985 je Weinstein ustanovil The Center for Democracy, kjer je bil predsednik in generalni direktor do leta 2003, ko je center prenehal delovati. V centru, ki je deloval za nadzor volitev med drugim na Floridi leta 2002, kot tudi v Srednji Ameriki, na Filipinih, v Rusiji in na Poljskem, so v tem obdobju delovali Robert L. Livingston, Jospeh Lieberman, Henry Kissinger (2002-2003), Richard G. Lugar, Thomas R. Pickering (2002-2003), Chuck Robb, Jim Nicholson, John Kerry, Christopher Dodd.

United States Institute of Peace –

Allen Weinstein je bil ustanovni član od United States Institute of Peace, ki je tudi zelo povezan z državnimi udari – barvnimi revolucijami in z ”liberalno CIA”. Zakonsko ustanovljen leta 1984 s strani takratnega predsenika ZDA Ronalda Reagana. USIP se financira preko kongresa. Z inštitutom so povezani super elitni predstavniki kot so Richard Salomon, Max Kampelman, Stephen Hadley, Evron Kirkpatrick, W. Scott Thompson, Ronald Lehman II, Eric Edelman, Madeleine Albright, Colin Powell, Condolleezza Rice, Donald Rumsfeld, Hillary Clinton, Walter Slocombe, John Kerry, Chuck Hagel, George Shultz, Thomas Pickering, Peter Ackerman, General Charles Wald.

Vodstvo od US Institute of Peace 2020 –

»Board of Directors … Stephen E. Biegun [International Republican Institute; Council on Foreign Relations; Freedom House] … Stephen J. Hadley [Council on Foreign Relations; The Scowcroft Group; Advisory Panel to the Director of Central Intelligence; Defense Policy Board; Carnegie Endowment for International Peace; vodilni propagandist liberalnega establišmenta za vojno proti Siriji] … Kerry Kennedy [chair of the Amnesty International USA Leadership Council; board member of the Human Rights First
»International Advisory Council … Robert Abernethy [Council on Foreign Relations; Truman National Security Project; Aspen Institute; Human Rights Watch; Atlantic Council; Pacific Council on International Policy; Brookings Institution; RAND Corporation ] … Peter Ackerman [Council on Foreign Relations; Atlantic Council; Freedom House; International Institute for Strategic Studies; vodilno CIA sredstvo za državne udare in barvne revolucije] … Joanne Leedom-Ackerman [Council on Foreign Relations; Save the Children; International Center for Journalists (Soros); International Crisis Group (Soros); Refugees International (Soros); Human Rights Watch (Soros); žena od Petra Ackermana]… Jacqueline Adams [CBS News; Council on Foreign Relations; Freedom House; Foreign Policy Association] … Nisha Biswal [U.S. Global Leadership Coalition; USAID] … Michael Chertoff [Trilateral Commission; Atlantic Council; Freedom House; Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs; Concordia Annual Summit] … Chester A. Crocker [Council on Foreign Relations; The International Institute of Strategic Studies; Global Leadership Foundation; American Academy of Diplomacy] … Richard Danzig [Center for Strategic and International Studies; RAND Corporation; Defense Policy Board; President’s Intelligence Advisory Board; Center for a New American Security; Aspen Strategy Group; Jackson Institute for Global Affairs; Rhodes Scholar; Rockefeller Foundation Fellow] … Raymond F. DuBois [Center for Strategic and International Studies] … Michèle Flournoy [Council on Foreign Relations; Center for a New American Security; President Obama’s Intelligence Advisory Board; CIA External Advisory Board; Defense Policy Board; Aspen Strategy Group; Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs; The Mitre Corporation; Spirit of America; CARE (”liberalna CIA”)] … Melanie Greenberg [Alliance for Peacebuilding (‘liberalna CIA’); William and Flora Hewlett Foundation (”liberalna CIA”); Institute of World Affairs] … Kathryn A. Hall [The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation (”liberalna CIA”); NextGen Climate Action(”liberalna CIA”)] … Frank Islam [blogs for Huffington Post (‘liberalna CIA’); Export-Import Bank of the United States] … M. Farooq Kathwari [Council on Foreign Relations; Center for Strategic and International Studies; Refugees International (George Soros)] … David Lane [Council on Foreign Relations; The Annenberg Foundation Trust (”liberalna CIA”); Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (”liberalna CIA”); ONE Campaign (George Soros, Bill Gates, Bono)] … Aaron Lobel [America Aborad Media] … Pat Mitchell [Council on Foreign Relations; Clinton Global Initiative; Human Rights Watch (Soros); International Women’s Forum; Sundance Institute (‘liberalna CIA’); Skoll Fund (‘liberalna CIA’); PBS; Paley Center for Media (Henry Kissinger)] … John Norton Moore [OSS Society (top CIA); Council on Foreign Relations; American Security Council (top ‘konservativna CIA’); Freedom House; Coloquium on Counterintelligence Conference; President’s Intelligence Oversight Board] … Charles S. Robb [Council on Foreign Relations; MITRE Corporation; Iraq Study Group] … Anne G. K. Solomon [Council on Foreign Relations]«6https://www.usip.org/about/international-advisory-council

The Global Panel –

Od leta 1993 do 1998 je bil Weinstein direktor od leta 1989 nastalega The Global Panel, kjer sta bila kasneje direktorja tudi Malcolm Rifkind in Dov Zakheim. Člani svetovalne uprave pa so bili v različnih obdobjih še Hans van den Broeck, General Wesley Clark, Paula Dobriansky, Stuart Eizenstadt, Gareth Evans, F. W. de Klerk, Thomas Pickering, Lord George Robertson in nekdanji direktor od CIA James Woolsey. Govorci na forumu so bili med drugim Paul Volcker, Henry Kissinger, Madeleine Albright, Colin Powell, George H. W. Bush, Jimmy Carter, Benjamin Netanyahu, Onno Ruding, Margareth Thatcher, Otto van Lambsdorff, jordanski kralj Hussein bin Talal, Karel Schwarzenberg, C. Boyden Gray, Radek Sikorski, Jean-Claude Trichet, Mary Robinson.

Foreign Policy Association –

Weinstein je bil od leta 1982-1991 član uredniške svetovalne uprave od Foreign Policy Association, kjer najdemo v različnih časovnih obdobjih člane liberalne super elite kot so – John Foster Dulles, Henry Luce III, Warren Christopher, William vanden Heuvel (The Nation – ”liberalna CIA”), John Train, James C. Whitehead, Henry Kissinger, James Shultz, James Baker III, James Greenberg (tudi pomemben financer preko AIG), Partick Gross, William Rhodes, Harold McGraw III, Theodore Roosevelt IV, Maurice Sonnenberg, George Soros, Bill Clinton, General Wesley Clark, Admiral Stansfield Turner.

Financerji od Foreign Policy Association leta 2001-2002 –
»$100,000 and above: … The Henry Luce Foundation … Merrill Lynch … The Starr Foundation … $50,000 and above: … American International Group … The AXA Group … Banco Santander Central Hispano … Deloitte & Touche … ENI … Exxon Mobil Corp. … The Financial Times … Goldman Sachs & Co. … JP Morgan Chase [Rockefeller] … Morgan Stanley & Co. … Pfizer Inc. … $30,000 and above: … The Boeing Companies … Bear Stearns & Co. … Citigroup … Credit Suisse First Boston … KPMG … Philip Morris Companies … PricewaterhouseCoopers … Sullivan & Cromwell … Vivendi Universal Fund … $20,000 and above: … Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. … IBM Corporation … Lehman Brothers … $15,000 and above: … The Blackstone Group … Bloomberg … The Chase Manhattan Foundation … Davis Polk & Wardwell … Deutsche Bank … The New York Times FoundationThe Whitehead Foundation … $10,000 and above … The Overbrook Foundation … $5,000 and above: … David Rockefeller«7https://www.fpa.org/usr_doc/FPA2002AnnualReport.pdf

Vodstvo in sodelavci od Foreign Policy Association leta 2001-2002, kjer najdemo številne člane liberalne super elite –

»EXECUTIVE COMMITEE: … Patrick W. Gross … BOARD OF DIRECTORS: … John E. Merow [Sullivan and Cromwell] … Peter A. Flaherty [McKinsey & Company] … Maurice R. Greenberg … Patrick W. Gross … John O. Hatab [PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP] … Peter F. Krogh [Walsh School of Foreign Services] … Donald H. Layton [J.P. Morgan Chase] … Henry Luce III … Donna Dillon Manning [Catalyst] … William J. McDonough [Federal Reserve Bank of New York] … Georgette Mosbacher [Atlantic Council] … Michael E. Patterson [J.P. Morgan Chase] … William R. Rhodes [Citigroup] … Theodore Roosevelt IV [Lehman Brothers] … Arthur Ross [United Nations Association of the USA] … Karl E. Ruhry [KPMG] … John Train … FELLOWS: … Arthur G. Altschul [Goldman Sachs] … Harrison M. Bains Bristol-Myers Squibb Company … Andy Barrons Financial Times … Peter D. Bell CARE … John Brademas New York University … Tom Brokaw NBC … J. Frank Brown PricewaterhouseCoopers … Mark M. Brown United Nations Development Programme … General Wesley K. ClarkWilliam Jefferson Clinton … Professor Joel E. Cohen Rockefeller University … Dr. Gordon R. Conway Rockefeller Foundation … John Wesley Cook The Henry Luce Foundation, Inc … Richard Cooper Harvard University … Walter Cronkite … Professor Lori F. Damrosch Columbia Law School … Florence A. Davis The Starr Foundation … Henri de Castries AXA … Douglas Dillon … Robert C. Dinerstein UBS Warburg … Axel I. Freudmann American International Group, Inc … Professor John L. Gaddis Yale University … David Gompert RAND CorporationVartan Gregorian Carnegie Corporation of New York … Alan R. Griffith Bank of New York … David A. Hamburg … Gary Hattem Deutsche Bank Americas Foundation … John M. Hennessy Credit Suisse First Boston … Frederick W. Hill Chase Manhattan Corporation … Frank W. Jenkins Science Applications International Corporation … Craig L. Johnstone The Boeing Company … Sir John O. KerrLawrence Kudlow … James M. Li American Express Company … . Peter Likins University of Arizona … Dr. James M. Lindsay The Brookings Institution … Lukas Muhlemann Credit Suisse Group … Kathleen A. Murray PricewaterhouseCoopers … Toby Myerson Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison … John D. Negroponte … Marina S. Ottaway Carnegie Endowment for International Peace … Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa The European Central Bank … Ernest T. Patrikis American International Group … David L. Pflug The Chase Manhattan Bank … Ellen R. Pomeroy Rockefeller Family & Associates … Raymond K. Price, Jr. The Economic Club of New York … Skip Rhodes Chevron Corporation … John B. Richardson U.S. Institute of Peace … Susan Robinson-King Carnegie Corporation of New York … Joe L. Roby Credit Suisse First Boston … Laurance S. Rockefeller … Onno Ruding Citibank, NA … Diane Sawyer ABC News … Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. … Serge Schmemann The New York TimesKlaus Schwab World Economic Forum Javier Solana-Madariaga Council on the European Union … Theodore C. Sorensen Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton and Garrison … George Soros … David C. Speedie Carnegie Corporation of New York … Patricia Q. Stonesifer Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation … Michael J. Stopford Exxon Mobil Corporation … Maurice Tempelsman … Admiral Stansfield Turner [CIA] … Lawrence R. Uhlick Institute of International Bankers … Paul A. VolckerCaspar W. Weinberger John C. Whitehead The Goldman Sachs Foundation … William J. Williams, Jr. Sullivan & Cromwell … Frank G. Wisner American International Group, Inc. … Jacob J. Worenklein Societe Generale … Andrew Young … John E. Young Cravath, Swaine & Moore … W. Dieter Zander Arnhold & S. Bleichroeder, Inc [Soros]«

So-ustanovitelj od NED je bil še Mark Palmer, ki je znan kot glavni pisec govorov od tedanjega državnega sekretarja Henryja Kissingerja, ter bil pod-predsedujoči od Freedom House (del ”konservativne CIA”, kljub temu tesno sodeluje z liberalnim establišmentom in je podpornik ”liberalne CIA”). Poleg tega je bil Palmer še član od Council on Foreign Relations, od 1987 do 2012. Bil so-ustanovitelj od Central European Media Enterprises (deluje na Češkem, Slovaškem, v Sloveniji, Romuniji, Bulgariji in Ukraiji), katero je ustanovil skupaj z Ronaldom Lauderjem, prav tako članom od Council on Foreign Relations (1998 – ). Lauder je financer in v vodstvu od World Jewish Congress, kot tudi od Anti-Defamation League; ter član svetovalne uprave od Israel Policy Fourm, udeleženec od Herzliya Conference, upravitelj od J. Paul Getty Trust (del ”liberalne CIA”), član nacionalne svetovalne uprave od America-Israel Friendship League (kombinacija liberalnih elit in pro-zinonističnih konservativcev; so-ustanovitelja Nelson Rockefeller in Henry Jackson), in bil finančni predsedujoči od New York Republican State Committee.
Palmer je bil tudi član elitne American Academy of Diplomacy; član od Committee on the Present Danger; član svetovalne uprave od Spirit of America; član direktorske uprave od Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training.

Mark Palmer

Pomemben so-ustanovitelj od NED je bil še Robie Marcus Hooker ‘ Mark’ Palmer splošno znan kot Mark Palmer, ki je bil sicer član uprave od NED v obdobju od 1990 – 1999. Palmer je znan kot glavni pisec govorov od tedanjega državnega sekretarja Henryja Kissingerja 

»Following initial Foreign Service assignments in New Delhi and Moscow, Mark’s creativity and penchant for action led to a position in the Department’s Policy Planning Council where he served as a primary speechwriter for Secretary Kissinger. From here he advanced quickly, serving as Political Counselor in Belgrade and then returning to Washington where Mark again put his speechwriting talent to use, most notably as the co-drafter of President Reagan’s historic 1982 Westminster speech to the British Parliament. This speech led, among other things, to the realization of another of Mark’s ideas, the creation of the National Endowment for Democracy, of which he was a co-founder and became long serving board member8https://americandiplomacy.web.unc.edu/2013/03/in-memoriam-mark-palmer/; dostop 30.1.2023

Palmer, ki je bil od leta 1987 – 2013 član od Council on Foreign Relations, je bil dolgoletni upravitelj in pod-predsedujoči od neokonservativne Freedom House, ki je sicer del ”konservativne CIA”, vendar je predvsem tesno povezan z liberalnim establišmentom in deluje v omrežju ”liberalne CIA”. Po njemu se tudi imenuje Mark Palmer Forum for Advancing Democracy pri Freedom House, ki preko Mark and Sushma Palmer Legacy Fund podeljuje Mark Palmer Prize.

Palmer je bil so-ustanovitelj podjetja Central European Media Enterprises (deluje na Češkem, Slovaškem, v Sloveniji, Romuniji, Bulgariji in Ukraiji), katerega je ustanovil skupaj z Ronaldom Lauderjem, prav tako članom od Council on Foreign Relations (1998 – ). Lauder je financer in v vodstvu od World Jewish Congress, kot tudi od Anti-Defamation League; ter član svetovalne uprave od Israel Policy Fourm, udeleženec od Herzliya Conference, upravitelj od J. Paul Getty Trust (del ”liberalne CIA”), član nacionalne svetovalne uprave od America-Israel Friendship League (kombinacija liberalnih elit in pro-zinonističnih konservativcev; so-ustanovitelja Nelson Rockefeller in Henry Jackson), in bil finančni predsedujoči od New York Republican State Committee.

Palmer je bil tudi član elitne American Academy of Diplomacy; član od neokonservativnega Committee on the Present Danger; bil član svetovalne uprave od Project on Middle East Democracy; bil direktor od Center for Democracy & Human Rights in Saudi Arabia; bil član svetovalne uprave od Spirit of America; bil član direktorske uprave od Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training; bil član uprave od Paul H. Nitze School for Advanced International Studies – John Hopkins University.; bil član uprave od Institute for the Study of Diplomacy – Georgetown University.

Palmer je bil leta 2009 član svetovalnega odbora od Democracy in U.S. Security Strategy, ki je bil program od Center for Strategic and International Studies.

»The consolidation and spread of democracy in the rest of the world unequivocally remains a U.S. strategic interest, but members of the strategic community hold multiple reasons why. … Zbigniew Brzezinski, recalling French strategic thinker Raymond Aron’s advice, recently counseled that “the strength of a great power is diminished if it ceases to serve an idea.” Since its inception and throughout U.S. history, democracy has been that idea«9CSIS, Democracy in U.S. Security Strategy, marec 2009; str. 1 

Vidnejši člani svetovalnega odbora so – Thomas Carothers (CFR, 1991 – ) – Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Open Society Foundations, NED; Larry Diamond (CFR, 2010 – ) – Hoover Institute, International Forum for Democratic Studies – NED; Elizabeth Dugan – International Republican Institute, US-ASEAN Business Council Institute; Stephen J. Flanagan (CFR, 1985 – ) – Center for Strategic and International Studies, RAND Corporation, International Institute for Strategic Studies; Francis Fukuyama (CFR, 1982 – ) – NED, RAND Corporation, Freedom House; Michael Fullilove – Brookings Institution, Center for Strategic and International Studies, International Institute for Strategic Studies, Lowy Institute; Robert E. Hunter (CFR, 1974 – ) – Fulbright Scholar, Atlantic Council, RAND Corporation, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs; G.John Ikenberry (CFR, 1993 – ) – Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Brookings Institution; Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs; Ashley J. Tellis (CFR, 1996 – ) – RAND Corporation, National Bureau of Asian Research, International Institute of Strategic Studies; Jennifer Windsor; Jennifer Windsor – Freedom House, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Women for Women International; Anne-Marie Slaughter (CFR, 1995 – ) – Atlantic Council, NED, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Center for a New American Security.

Najvidnejši posamezniki, ki so sodelovali pri projektu (odebeljen tisk), so hkrati tudi člani od CFR – Richard Armitage; R. Nicholas Burns; Chester Crocker; Paula Dobriansky – NED;  Georges Fauriol – International Republican Institute; Michele Flournoy; Carl Gershman – NED; Richard Haass; Barbara Haig – NED; Morton Halperin – Open Society Policy Center; Lee Hamilton – NED; Francois Heisbourg – International Institute for Strategic Studies; Jim Hoagland, The Washington Post; Stephen Krasner; Jessica Mathews – Carnegie Endowment for International Peace; Walter Russell Mead; Joseph Nye; Marc Plattner – NED; Thomas Pickering; Brent Scowcroft – IRI; Strobe Talbott; Karin Von Hippel – CSIS; Ken Wollack – NDI; Fareed Zakaria; Phil Zelikow.

Ustanovni člani od National Endowment for Democracy

Vodstvo od NED, skozi različna obdobja, predstavljajo posamezniki iz samega vrha liberalnega establišmenta, ki so hkrati tesno povezani s Council on Foreign Relations.

Ustanovni člani uprave leta 1983 – 

Vidnejši člani uprave od NED

Večina biografskih podatkov od spodaj navedenih članov je tukaj

 Ostali povezani z NED –

Financerji od NED

NED je v glavnem financiran s strani USAID, ki je vladna agencija, zelo tesno povezana z liberalnim establišmentom, in je pomemben financer in promotor ”liberalne CIA”. USAID deluje preko U.S. State Department, kot del ameriško globalistične-imperialistične politike. State Department pa je pod popolno kontrolo od Council on Foregin Relations.  Poleg USAID so ključni financerji od NED fundacije ”liberalne CIA” in tudi ”konservativne CIA”, vodilne korporacije in delavski sindikati, ki so del omrežja ”liberalne CIA”.

Financerji od NED leta 1999 (poleg USAID) –

»AFL-CIOAmerican Federation of Teachers … John Brademas. The Lynde and Harry Bradley FoundationCarnegie Corporation of New York. CIVITAS. Communication Workers of America. Paula Dobriansky. Thomas R. Donahue … Donner Canadian Foundation … [Malcolm] Steve Forbes. Ford Foundation. Freedom House. German Marshall Fund of the United States … Fred Ikle … Winston & Bette Bao Lord … Richard Lugar … Mark Palmer … Polish American Enterprise FundThe Starr Foundation [Maurice Greenberg]. Tata Steel. U.S. Department of StateUnited Steelworkers of America. John C. Whitehead … Frank Wisner [CIA]«10NED, Annual Report 1999; str. 89

Financerji od NED leta 2005 (poleg USAID) – 

»Albert Shanker Institute. American Federation of Teachers. Arnold & Porter LLP. John Brademas. Bradley Foundation. Canadian Donner Foundation. Thomas R. Donahue … The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation … Fred and Doris Ikle … Microsoft Corporation. Mark and Sushma Palmer … U.S. Department of State — Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. Whitehead Foundation«11NED, Annual Report 2005; str. 144

Financerji od NED leta 2012 (poleg USAID) – 

»AFL-CIO. Bingham McCutchen LLP. The Bodman Foundation. Canadian International Development Agency. Center for Democracy and Development in the Americas … The Eli and Edyth Broad Foundation.
The Hurford Foundation. International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftsmen. The Lynde & Harry Bradley Foundation. Pacific Council on International Policy … Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency [SIDA] … University of Toronto
Thomas R. Donahue. Kenneth Duberstein … Frank Fahrenkopf, Jr. … Mark & Sushma Palmer  … John Whitehead«12NED, Annual Report 2012; str. 116

Financiranje od NED

Vodilni organizaciji, ki spadata pod okrilje od NED in, ki predstavljata okoli 50% njegovega letnega proračuna sta National Democratic Institute for International Affairs in International Republican Institute.

Ključne štiri organizacije, ki spadajo pod okrilje od NED so – 

Nekaj pomembnejših organizacij, katerih financer je NED – 

National Democratic Institute

Leta 1983 ustanovljeni in z Demokratsko stranko povezani National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI), katerega financirata hkrati še USAID, ter direktno tudi U.S. Department of State.

Piše se leto 1986, ko Sidney Blumenthal (CFR, 1992 – ), kasnejši višji svetovalec od Hillary Clinton, napiše spodnji članek za The Washington Post  – 

»A U.S. organization that has received substantial funds from the National Endowment for Democracy, a federally financed agency, has been funneling most of the money to opponents of the Sandinista government in Nicaragua, an official of the group said yesterday.

The organization, called Friends of the Democratic Center in Central America (Prodemca) [Richard Penn Kemble – NDI; Vladimir Bukovsky; J. Peter Grace – Council for National Policy; Theodore M. Hesburgh; Sidney Hook; Samuel P. Huntington; John T. Joyce – NDI; Jeane Kirkpatrick; Bayard Rustin; Maurice Sonnenberg; Elie Wiesel] [leta 1988 se Prodemca združi s Freedom House], has used the government money to help the opposition newspaper La Prensa and an anti-Sandinista human rights group.

Prodemca also has placed full-page advertisements in The Washington Post, The New York Times and The Washington Times urging Congress to support President Reagan’s request for $100 million in military and nonlethal aid to the Nicaraguan counterrevolutionaries, or contras, but an official of the group said the ads were not purchased with government money.

“We support military assistance to the Nicaraguans fighting for democracy,” said the ad.

Over the last year and a half, Prodemca has received about $400,000 in grants from the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), Penn Kemble [NDI; Coalition for a Democratic Majority; Freedom House], a member of Prodemca’s executive committee, said yesterday. …

The NED was created by the Reagan administration in 1983 to campaign for democracy and against communism. Last year, it became embroiled in a controversy over interference in French politics when the Paris newspaper Liberation disclosed that the Free Trade Union Institute, established under NED’s aegis, gave money to an anticommunist group with murky ties to a far-right paramilitary organization.

NED director Carl Gershman is a neoconservative and former senior aide to former U.N. ambassador Jeane J. Kirkpatrick. The Free Trade Union Institute director is Eugenia Kemble [CFR, 1989 – ; Albert Shanker Institute; AFL-CIO], sister of Penn Kemble [NDI].

Penn Kemble serves on the board of the Democratic Institute, another group funded by the NED. “Ask our mother if you think this is a conspiracy,” he said. He is also chairman of the executive committee of the Coalition for a Democratic Majority, a small neoconservative group within the Democratic Party.

Prodemca was founded in 1981 with grants from right-wing foundations [”konservativna CIA”] — the Smith-Richardson Foundation, the Olin Foundation and the Carthage Foundation. Many of the signers of its ad are neoconservatives, but some were prominent Carter administration officials: Zbigniew Brzezinski, national security affairs adviser; David Aaron, Brzezinski’s deputy; and Richard Holbrooke, assistant secretary of state.

“Prodemca appears to be flying under false colors in portraying itself as a citizens’ organization when it is actually a vehicle for distributing funds to anti-Sandinista organizations,” said Aryeh Neier [top sredstvo ”liberalne CIA”; Open Society Institute; Human Rights Watch; ACLU], vice chairman of Americas Watch, an independent human rights group that opposes contra aid.«https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1986/03/19/grantee-of-us-endowment-funds-sandinista-opponents/d2a1b24a-56ea-486f-b936-f8cbcf7e0c26/

Vidnejši člani uprave od NDI 

Člani višje svetovalne uprave

Financerji in partnerske organizacije in stranke od NDI – 

Financerji od NDI leta 1997 –

Financerji od NDI leta 2009 – 

Partnerske organizacije od NDI leta 2009 – 

Partnerske politične stranke in organizacije od NDI leta 2009 – 

Financerji v obdobju 2021/2022 poleg NED –

International Republican Institute

Leta 1983 ustanovljeni in z Republikansko stranko povezani International Republican Institute, katerega prav tako financira še USAID. IRI je top financer ”mladih aktivistov” in feminizma, kot tudi tesno povezan s skrajnimi islamisti.

Dobitnik nagrade leta 2009 od 25. letnici delovanja IRI Henry Kissinger.

Vidnejši člani uprave od IRI – 

Vidnejši član svetovalnega odbora (deluje le nekje do leta 1990) od IRI –

Vidnejši člani mednarodnega odbora od IRI, 2015  –

Vidnejši financerji leta 2001  –

Financerji od IRI leta 2004 

3M; Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP; American Enterprise Institute; American International Group, Inc. (AIG); Americans for Democracy; AT&T Corporation; BP p.l.c.; Charles Schwab; ChevronTexaco Corporation; Comcast Corporation; Daimler Chrysler Fund; Deutsche Post World Net USA, Inc.; Diligence, LLC (CIA); Exxon Mobile; Ford Motor Company; General Motors Corporation; Goldman Sachs & Co.; IFES [The International Foundation for Electoral Systems]; Lockheed Martin Corporation; Microsoft Corporation; Motorola, Inc.; O’Melveny & Myers; Project for Transitional Democracies; Raytheon Company; Russell Family Foundation; The Annenberg Foundation; The Blackstone Group; The Boeing Company; The Scowcroft Group; Time Warner; Toyota Motor Sales, USA; Union Pacific; Verizon Communications; Maurice Sonnenberg.21IRI, Annual Report 2004; str. 19

Financerji in partnerji od IRI leta 2022

CIA, NED in delavski sindikati

»Carl Gershman, a former aide to Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, the chief United States delegate to the United Nations, is setting up shop here these days in a difficult new job.

He is head of the new National Endowment for Democracy, a federally financed foundation designed to compete in the worldwide struggle for people’s minds by financing ”democratic institution-building” in foreign lands. The designated spenders of this public money are the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, the Chamber of Commerce of the United States, the Democratic National Committee and the Republican National Committee.

Despite confrontational positions here at home, the four groups are now bound together in a commitment to a foreign mission: the encouragement of American-style pluralistic societies abroad.

Money Has Begun to Flow

They are also bound together, of course, by the Federal money, about $62 million over the next two years, that has already begun to flow from the offices of NED, as Washington’s acronym mania has already named the new endowment. But among the Congressional sponsors of this so-called Project Democracy – foremost among them Representative Dante B. Fascell of Florida, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee – there is a strong belief that private citizens, operating in the open, can be more effective than secret agents in spreading the seeds of democratic ideas.

The notion of a Project Democracy first gained attention when President Reagan mentioned it in a speech to the British Parliament two years ago. As later presented in a proposal to Congress, it would have been operated by the United States Information Agency. But controversies surrounding the U.S.I.A. director, Charles Z. Wick, inspired House Democrats, led by Mr. Fascell, to the alternative of an independent National Endowment for Democracy.

American Values Abroad

In the private sector’s promotion of American values abroad, until now only the American labor movement, through the Free Trade Union Institute it formed in 1978, has gone much beyond rhetoric. Largely with money from the State Department’s Agency for International Development, the A.F.L.-C.I.O. has run programs overseas under its African American Free Labor Council, Asian American Free Labor Institute and American Institute for Free Labor Development.

Through these groups, American labor’s emissaries tried, for example, to organize South Vietnamese workers during the war there, sought to unionize farm workers in Grenada before the American-led invasion last year and have been active in Brazil, Chile, the Dominican Republic, Guyana and El Salvador.

Although the connection has been denied, they were sometimes accused or suspected of involvement with the Central Intelligence Agency. In El Salvador in 1981, two American employees of the American Institute for Free Labor Development who had been accused of links with the C.I.A. were shot to death in the coffee shop of the San Salvador Sheraton.

But because it has gained long experience in its programs abroad, the labor movement is to get nearly a quarter of the democracy endowment’s largesse, or $13.8 million a year.

By comparison, the newly created ”international institute” of both the Democratic and Republican National Committees each is to get $5 million a year, and the Chamber of Commerce gets $2.5 million for its new Center for International Private Enterprise. The Democratic and Republican institutes are modeled after the long-established practice in several European countries, particularly West Germany, where the main political parties now divide about $150 million a year in government grants for overseas encouragement of democratic institutions and ideas.

Criticism From Panama

Representative Hank Brown, Republican of Colorado, a critic of the democracy endowment concept, said today that NED-financed activities in Central America had already drawn criticism from James E. Briggs, the Ambassador to Panama.

Mr. Brown said he had obtained from the U.S.I.A. a paraphrased copy of a cable that Ambassador Briggs sent to Washington in April complaining that the American Institute for Free Labor Development, one of the A.F.L.-C.I.O. affiliates, had been given funds by NED to cover the expenses of ”activists” supporting the Presidential campaign of Nicolas Ardito Barletta. Mr. Barletta, the candidate backed by the Panamanian military, narrowly defeated former President Arnulfo Arias Madrid in the May 6 election.

Ambassador Briggs was quoted as saying in the cable: ”It would be embarrassing to the United States if the labor institute’s use of endowment funds to support one side in Panama’s elections became public knowledge. The Ambassador requests that this project be discontinued before the U.S. Government is further compromised in Panama.”

Mr. Gershman, reached in New York today, said the Panamanian issue ”came up before I got the endowment.” He confirmed that about $20,000 in Government funds had been used by the labor institute in Panama to support the Barletta campaign, but said: ”I am not sure it was NED money, and in any case it is my understanding that this has all been worked out to everybody’s satisfaction – the Ambassador’s, the State Department’s and the institute’s.”

The C.I.A. Obstacle

One of the obstacles that Mr. Gershman must overcome is the C.I.A.’s reputed secret involvement in the past in a lot of what the Endowment for Democracy hopes to do in the open: encouragement of political parties compatible with United States interests, of vigorous labor unions and democratic press and church groups and the publication of writings by pro-Western dissidents. As one of its first actions the NED board voted to forbid any employment of C.I.A. personnel or covert C.I.A. agenda in its programs.

When Congress considered the creation of the National Endowment for Democracy last fall, the prospect of a C.I.A. presence so worried Senator William Proxmire, Democrat of Wisconsin, that he persuaded the Senate to bar from NED anyone who had worked for the C.I.A. for the last 20 years. This, in turn, so affronted William J. Casey, the  Director of Central Intelligence, that he negotiated a compromise with Senator Proxmire before final adoption of the bill.

”On behalf of the intelligence community, I have agreed with Senator Proxmire that the National Endowment for Democracy will not be used to conduct intelligence activities,” Mr. Casey said at the time. ”In addition, I have reached a general understanding that intelligence community personnel shall not be permitted employment by the National Endowment for Democracy except as jointly agreed in future negotiations with Senator Proxmire.”

Congressional qualms were evident, too, about the concept of committing public funds to the political poles of America’s two-party system. Representative Brown tried in vain to bar the new Democratic and Republican international institutes as recipients of Project Democracy money.

In addition, Mr. Brown is now trying to gather support for legislation that would specificially include NED under the Freedom of Information Act. The endowment, because it was set up as a private organization, is not covered by the Act, which requires Government agencies to disclose, on request, nonsecurity information to citizens and the press.

Of High and Low Profiles

Mr. Gershman, who was educated at Yale and Harvard, is a former chairman of the Young People’s Socialist League and former executive director of Social Democrats, U.S.A., in effect the right wing of American socialism. At the United Nations, he often castigated the United States’ critics from the Communist bloc and third world.

In his new job in Washington, where he will be spending millions of public dollars, and perhaps corporate donations later, Mr. Gershman says he plans to keep a lower profile than he had at the United Nations.

In fact, the turnabout for the 40- year-old Mr. Gershman may alter his personal life as much as his career.

He now commutes on weekends to his apartment home on Upper Broadway in Manhattan. In July, though, with his $75,000 Project Democracy salary, he plans to move his wife and three children to an upscale subdivision in North Bethesda, Md.

With a mixed expression of anticipation and guilt, he described the house as ”too nice.” Reflecting, perhaps, on his anti-Communist Socialist past, he then observed, self-critically: ”In order to have an appropriate sense of the world one must live with a certain sense of hardship.’”«23https://www.nytimes.com/1984/05/29/us/project-democracy-takes-wing.html

NED – barvne revolucije, državni udari, financiranje volitev, neoliberalizem in globalizacija

NED izvaja državne udare in barvne revolucije v državah, ki so ’’sovražne’’ do ZDA oz. bolj natančno do liberalnega establišmenta. Povedno drugače – gre se za države, ki se niso hotele ali se nočejo ukloniti globalnemu tržno-podrejenemu političnemu redu. Zgodnje dejavnosti od NED v prvi polovici 80ih in kasneje, so bile usmerjene predvsem na države vzhodne Evrope. Prva na seznamu je bila Poljska. Po razpadu Sovjetske zveze je liberalni establišment izvajal mehke državne udare oz. barvne revolucije v pro-ruskih državah, kot so Ukrajina, Srbija, Gruzija in Kirgistan. Zahodni mediji so seveda poročali, da so ti državni udari in protesti spontane, avtohtone in ljudske vstaje, ki pa so v resnici bile rezultat obširnega planiranja in ogromno vloženega truda. Liberalni establišment in njegovi evropski zavezniki so na post-komunističnih državah izvajali številne različne svetovalne pritiske in finančne mehanizme, kot tudi kampanjske tehnologije in tehnike za t.i. ’’demokratično pomoč’’. Orodja, ki so jih uporabili so izstopne in javnomnenjske raziskave, fokusne skupine za ’’revolucionarno sporočanje’’, ter metode in usposabljanje za ’’strateški nenasilni konflikt’’. Poleg NED so bili ključni tuji agentje, ki so bili vpleteni v proces ustvarjanja ’’transnacionalnih demokracij’’ še USAID, International Republican Institute, National Democratic Institute, AFL-CIO, Freedom House, Sorosova Open Society Institute in Ackermanov International Center on Nonviolent Conflict, ki domuje na Tufts University. Razvoji teh dogodkov so bili del širšega neoliberalnega programa odpiranja na področju vzhodne Evrope za komercialno, strateško vojaško, kulturno in politično dominacijo s strani držav G7, ki so dejansko omrežje držav, ki delujejo pod taktirko Rockefellerjeve Trilateral Commission.

Razpad Sovjetske zveze je tako omogočil liberalnemu establišmentu, da je izvajal novo metodo intervencije, ’’mehki imperializem’’, ki se mu uradno reče ’’promocija demokracije’’. Konec 90ih in na začetku novega tisočletja, so zahodni mediji rutinsko predstavljali serijske politične prevrate, ki so se dogajali v Srbiji, Gruziji in Ukrajini, kot tudi drugod po vzhodni Evropi in centralni Aziji, kot legitimen boj demokracije ’’ljudske moči’’ nad tiranijo. Liberalni establišment je aktivno spodbujal politično mobilizacijo na področjih, kjer so po vrstnem redu odstavili Slobodana Miloševića v Srbiji, Eduarda Shevardnadzeja v Gruziji in razveljavili izvolitev Viktorja Yanukovycha v Ukrajini.

Leta 2000, za časa pobude o strmoglavljenju Slobodana Miloševića, je imel State Department že pripravljen ’’revolucionarni predlog’’, ki je začel dobivati svojo podobo v 90ih na Slovaškem, na Hrvaškem, v Romuniji in Bolgariji, in je postal za celotno Evrazijsko regijo ne-militaristični in stroškovno učinkovit način za premagovanje levičarskih in nacionalnih voditeljev držav. T.i. demokratična pomoč, ki so jo deležne v glavnem post-komunistične države, je sestavljena iz financiranja in ostalih podpornih mehanizmov, ki so zasnovani okoli tržnih načel, da bi učinkovali na hitro menjavo režima, in politično in ekonomsko ’’šok terapijo’’ v izbranih državah, katere je liberalni establišment smatral kot ovire za globalni tržno-podrejeni politični red. Pri tem so liberalni establišment in njegovi mediji ohlapno uporabljali pojme ’’diktatura’’ in ’’revolucija’’, da bi opisali stanje v teh državah, kar pa ni bil resnični opis. V resnici je (bila) večina teh oblasti pol-avtoritarnih. In če so bolj militantne skupine načrtovale bolj radikalne izide, so končale kot ’’neuspele revolucije’’.

V to dogajanje so bili močno vpeti tudi vodilni Rockefellerjevi agentje, ki so vsi prihajali iz področja vzhodne Evrope – to so bili so-ustanovitelj od Trilateral Commission in kasneje direktor od NED Zbigniew Brzezinski; že večkrat omenjeni George Soros; in Madeleine Albright, ustanovna pod-predsedujoča in dolgoletna predsedujoča od National Democratic Institute.

Za ustanovitev ’’dobro-delujočih trgov’’ v vzhodni Evropi, je bila predpogoj neoliberalna sestava vlade, kot tudi Zahodni način volilne kampanje, ki bi olajšal njen prevzem oblasti. Izziv za liberalni establišment je bilo odkritje zanesljivega ’’vodstva’’, ki je bilo pripravljeno opustiti državno lastništvo in socialne programe, ki so ostali od socialističnega obdobja. Za strmoglavljenje obstoječih vlad je bila potrebna mobilizacija političnih disidentov okoli enega pro-Zahodnega političnega kandidata, natančen nadzor anket in sofisticirane kampanjske propagandne tehnike, kot je bilo to v primeru Bolgarije, Romunije, Hrvaške in Slovaške v drugi polovici 90ih.

V Gruziji in v Kirgistanu, kjer sta bila na oblasti Eduard Shevardnadze in Askar Akaev, oba prvotno podprta s strani liberalnega establišmenta, sta kasneje preko NED in Sorosa, odstranjena iz oblasti. Tako Shevardnadze kot Akaey, ki ju State Department prvotno imenuje post-komunistična osvoboditelja, sta bila vdana podpornika od IMF in pro-Zahodna liberalna demokrata.

’’Promocija demokracije’’ je na splošno propagandni pojem, ki se konstantno uporablja za ključne državne interese liberalnega establišmenta in posledično tudi Evropske unije – kar zajema transnacionalno ekonomsko integracijo (CFR; Trilateral Commission; skupina Bilderberg; World Economic Forum), nadzor nad regionalno proizvodnjo in distribucijo energije, članstvo v zvezi NATO in varnostne iniciative (skupina Bilderberg; Atlantic Council; Munich Security Conference), in izolacije Rusije (Putin, ki je med drugim imenovan Global Leader for Tomorrow – WEF, je del KGB/FSB elite, ki nadzoruje ruske naravne vire, think tanke in obrambne korporacije).

Ključni faktor pri organizaciji menjave režimov je denar, ki je namenjen predvsem za organiziranje komunikacije, medijev in propagande, organiziranje protestov, izvajanje javnomnenjskih raziskav in upravljanje kampanje izbranih opozicijskih voditeljev.

Več vzhodno evropskih političnih skupin, ki so bile vpletene v menjavo režimov, je uporabilo ’’nenasilne organizacijske tehnike’’, ki so jih prevzeli iz pisanja CIA sredstva Gena Sharpa iz Albert Einstein Institute (AEI). Sharp, ki je trdil, da je njegov navdihujoči mentor Ghandi, je bil tudi profesor na Harvard University. Leta 2004 je AEI natisnil 12,000 kopij Sharpovega manifesta ’’nenasilne menjave režimov’’ From Dictatorship to Democracy, ki jih je uporabljala opozicija v Ukrajini. USAID in Freedom House sta dodatno financirala publikacijo in razdelila 5000 kopij po Vzhodno evropski regiji. Srbski Otpor je prevzel dele prejšnje Sharpove knjige The Politics of Nonviolent Action, ki jih je uporabil v dokumentu, ki so ga poimenovali Otpor User Manual. Poleti leta 2000 je International Republican Institute pripeljal Sharpovega kolega iz AEI Roberta Helveyja v Budimpešto, da bi tam usposabljal Otpor v strateškem nenasilju. Polkovnik Helvey, ki je bil po besedah nekdanjega direktorja indijske zunanje obveščevalne RAW B. Ramana, uradnik pri Defence Intelligence Agency (spada pod Pentagon), kjer je bil del prikritega organiziranja Mjanmarskih študentov, da so delali za Aung San Suu Kyi. Poleg tega pa je Helvey preko AEI in NED usposabljal hongkongške študentske voditelje tehnike množičnih demonstracij, ki so jih nato leta 1989 uporabili na Tiananmen Square. Deloval pa naj bi tudi kot svetovalec od Falun Gong, kitajske verske sekte, ki naj bi jo izobraževal s podobnimi tehnikami državljanske nepokorščine. Falun Gong je imela leta 1999 med 70 do 100 milijonov članov, vendar je sekto kitajska oblast istega leta tudi prepovedala. Aktivisti, ki jih je v Budimpešti usposabljal Helvey so se nato vrnili v Srbijo, kjer so nato sami vsak teden organizirali usposabljanje za obvladovanja strahu in strateško nenasilje vse do volitev leta 2000. Ukrajinska mladinska protestniška skupina Pora je imela Sharovo knjigo za svojo ’’biblijo’’.

V Gruziji je liberalni establišment zagotavljal usposabljanje na novinarje in sodnike. Hkrati pa je skupaj s tujimi nevladnimi organizacijami omogočil slovaškim veteranom iz akcijske skupine OK’98 (Pavol Demeš) da obiščejo in svetujejo gruzijskim opozicijskim silam, da pripravijo strmoglavljenje Shevardnadzeja. Vse skupaj je liberalni establišment za volitve v Gruziji porabil $2,4 milijona. Ostali financerji pa so bili še Evropska unija, Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), in Council of Europe.

Po uspešni revoluciji in odstavitvi Shevardnadzeja v Gruziji je David Dettman (NAACP Voter Empowerment Project, 2000 – 2002), direktor od NDI v Kijevu, odpotoval v Tbilisi, kjer se je posvetoval z gruzijskim direktorjem od NDI, če bi bilo možno izpeljati podobno revolucijo tudi v Ukrajini. Dettman je bil odločen, da je to možno izpeljati in je kasneje pomagal organizirati tabore za usposabljanje za ukrajinsko mladinsko gibanje, ki so ga vodili aktivisti srbskega Otpor, prvotni financer pa je bila britanska verzija od NED Westminster Foundation. Nato je financiranje teh taborov prevzel Freedom House. Gruzijski strokovnjaki so prav tako prispeli v Ukrajino, da bi pomagali pri uporu proti Kučmi in nato proti Yanukovychu. Nekdanji uradnik od Liberty Institute (financiran s strani Sorosa in NED) Gigi Targamadze (tesen zaveznik Mikhaila Saakashvilija) odpotuje v Kijev skupaj še z nekaterimi mladinskimi aktivisti Kmare, medtem, ko je ukrajinska Pora poslala v Tbilisi svoj kontingent na usposabljanje. Logistika je bila financirana s strani liberalnega establišmenta.

Mark Palmer, ki je bil za časa predsednikovanja Georgea H. W. Busha njegov ambasador na Madžarskem, je leta 1989 izjavil –

»I’m open about supporting the opposition parties, including getting money for them from the National Endowment for Democracy. … I think we should be proud of it26Gerald Sussman and Sascha Krader. Template Revolutions: Marketing U.S. Regime Change in Eastern Europe. Portland State University. Str. 102.

Palmer, kot je bilo že omenjeno, je bil seveda član od CFR, so-ustanovitelj od NED in pod-predsedujoči od Freedom House.

V ozadju teh barvnih revolucij in državnih udarov, ki jih je izvajal liberalni establišment, obstaja odločna pristranskost v korist določenih ekonomskih, vojaških in strateško političnih ciljev, preko katerih se prikažejo lažni nameni glede demokratičnih motivov vodilnih ameriških donatorskih inštitucij. Od $15,9 milijard, ki iih je USAID do leta 2003 namenil za programa Support for East European Democracy in Freedom Support Act za podporo tržne demokracije na področju centralne in vzhodne Evrope, jih je bilo 53% namenjenih za ekonomske reforme in samo 17% za izgradnjo demokracije. Leta 1997 je NATO-v trg orožja v regiji znašal vsaj $35 milijard, medtem, ko je ocenjena NATO-va prodaja orožja v regiji v naslednjih 10-15ih letih dosegla okoli $125 milijard $.

»Prospective new [CEE] NATO countries are being pressured to purchase advanced weaponry that will not meet their legitimate security needs and that will instead jeopardise stability in the region27Gerald Sussman and Sascha Krader. Template Revolutions: Marketing U.S. Regime Change in Eastern Europe. Portland State University. Str. 105.

Da bi se podprlo tako pričakovane visoke dobičke, je povsem logična postavitev neoliberalnih in pro-Zahodnih voditeljev na položaje, ne glede na njihove trdne zaveze participativni demokraciji. Kot pravi William I. Robinson, je vrsta demokracije, ki se implementira poliarhija – to je elitistična struktura dostopa, ki minimalizira vladno regulacijo zunanjih organizacij in njihovih lokalnih kolegov iz internacionalističnih nevladnih organizacij in ostalih lokalnih političnih in ekonomskih interesnih skupin. Poleg tega je liberalnemu establišmentu postalo jasno, da avtoritarne oblike družbenega nadzora in mednarodnega reda niso sposobne preživeti v dobi globalizma.

»As capitalist globalization advanced, global elites forged consensus around what I referred as the transnational agenda of neo-liberalism and polyarchy (‘democracy’). Neo-liberalism is a policy model for establishing the conditions that allow for transnational capital mobility and globalized circuits of production and distribution. In turn, global elites hope that polyarchic (‘democratic’) political arrangements will prove to be a more resilient form of social control than authoritarian and dictatorial rule. As countries and regions have integrated into global capitalism, they have seen the rise of new transnationally oriented elites organized in business associations, political parties, civic groups, the mass media and so on that are supported by the United States’ and Western
political intervention programmes conducted under the rubric of ‘promoting democracy’. ‘Democracy promotion’ programmes seek to cultivate these transnationally oriented elites who are favourably disposed to open up their countries to free trade and transnational corporate investment. They also seek to isolate those counter-elites who are not amenable to the transnational project and also to contain the masses from becoming politicized and mobilized on their own, independent of or in opposition to the transnational elite project by incorporating them ‘consensually’ into the political order these programmes seek to establish. … [I]t became clear that authoritarian forms of social control and international order are not viable in the age of globalization. Dictatorships are unstable, and their crony capitalism is not compatible with free market capitalism. Fluid global accumulation requires flexible political systems that allow for competition and circulation among elites and the consensual incorporation of masses; polyarchy facilitates hegemonic incorporation (as opposed to coercive exclusion). In this regard, there was a certain elective affinity in the late twentieth century between capitalist globalization and polyarchy. Dictatorships and authoritarian regimes open up crises among elites and space for popular classes to contest the elite order. Theoretically, the turn to United States’ ‘democracy promotion’ constituted a shift from coercive to consensual mechanisms of domination in the international system28William I Robinson. Promoting polyarchy: 20 years later. University of California at Santa Barbara. 2013. Str. 228 – 231.

1. Poljska v 80ih

  • Na Poljskem je ključen delavski sindikat Solidarnost. Eden od najpomembnejših zmag za NED je prišla konec 80ih, ko NED skupaj s CIA in ameriškimi delavskimi sindikati, pomaga, da preko Solidarnosti, katere predsedujoči je Lech Walesa, pomaga končati komunizem na Poljskem.
  • Poleg NED so na poljskem močno dejavne še njegove štiri pod-veje, National Democratic Institute, International Republican Institute, Solidarity Center od AFL-CIO in Center for International Private Enterprise od US Chamber of Commerce. Poleg njih pa še USAID, Freedom House, Sorosova Open Society Institute.
  • Eden od ključnih sindikatov, preko katerega se financira Solidarnost je z NED, CIA in s Trilateral Commission tesno povezani delavski sindikat AFL-CIO. Tedanji predsednik od AFL-CIO Lane Kirkland, ki je ustanovni član od Trilateral Commission in ustanovni član uprave od NED, je zaradi svojih aktivnosti dobil prepoved potovanja na Poljsko, kjer se je leta 1981 hotel udeležiti prvega nacionalnega kongresa od Solidarnosti.
  • Vodilni aktivist pri Solidarnosti je bil znanstvnik Jerzy Milewski, ki je leta 1982 pripotoval v ZDA na konferenco o laserjih, ko je bilo na Poljskem razglašeno vojno stanje. Jerzy Milewski je bil tam v stiku z Adrianom Karatnyckyim, ki je tedaj delal za A. Philip Randolph Institute, ki je povezan z AFL-CIO, ter hkrati z vodilnimi neokonservativci in vodilnimi Afro-ameriškimi aktivisti. Za časa trajanja vojnega stanja na Poljskem, je Milewski ustanovil ambasado od Solidarnosti v Bruslju, ter hkrati tesno sodeloval z AFL-CIO in ostalimi zahodnimi delavskimi sindikati. Bruseljska pisarna od Solidarnosti je postala uradni glas od Solidarnosti na zahodu in kar je še pomembneje, preko bruseljske pisarne je AFL-CIO kanaliziral pomoč Solidarnosti.
  • Do sredine leta 1982 je delovalo na stotine skupin od Solidarnosti. Pojavili pa so se tudi številni podtalni časopisi in bilteni. NED je preko Free Trade Union Institute od AFL-CIO kanaliziral več milijonov $, s katerimi so kupili številne tiskarske stroje, računalnike, na stotine mimeografskih strojev, na tisoče litrov tiskarskega črnila, sto tisoče šablon, video kamer in opremo za radijsko oddajanje. Kasneje je na Poljskem obstajalo več kot 400 podtalnih periodičnih publikacij, nekatere od njih so imele tudi do 30,000 izvodov. Alternativna video podjetja so ustvarila popularne dokumentarce, ki jih je videlo na milijone gledalcev v cerkvah in doma.
  • Iz Solidarnosti prihaja tudi Adam Michnik, ki je bil njen svetovalec in urednik njenega časopisa Gazeta Wyborcza. Michnik je nekje od leta 1996 – 2003 tudi član mednarodne svetovalne uprave od Council on Foreign Relations. Michnik pa postane tudi član mednarodne svetovalne uprave od Journal of Democracy, ki izhaja v okviru National Endowment for Democracy.
  • Leta 1987 in 1988 je ameriški kongres financiral Solidarnost vsakič v višini $1 milijona preko Free Trade Union Institute od AFL-CIO. ZDA pa so pomagale Solidarnosti tudi preko International Rescue Committee, in sicer preko Social Foundation, ki je bila tedaj še nelegalna fundacija. IRC je tako kot NED še eno od orodij od CIA na področju geopolitike globalizma. Uradno je bila pomoč od IRC v obliki medicinske opreme in zdravil.
  • Maja in avgusta leta 1988 pa so Poljsko zajeli tudi veliki delavski protesti, na katerih so delavci vzklikali “Nie ma wolnosci bez Solidarnosci” (“There’s no freedom without Solidarity”). Vse to je privedlo do tega, da je avgusta nastala nova vlada, ki bila prva nekomunistična vlada v Varšavskem paktu.

»Congress appropriated $1 million for Solidarity in July last year [1987] and another $1 million in December [1987]. The public nature of the grants was unusual; in the past, much of the American support for opposition groups in Communist countries was sent secretly by the Central Intelligence Agency. But Solidarity supporters say the assistance is, in some ways, more effective if it is given openly because they are less vulnerable to charges of being tools of Western intelligence services. …
Some of the support is channeled surreptitiously through Polish emigre groups in Paris, in Brussels and in Lund, Sweden, where Jozef Lebenbaum’s Independent Polish Agency has organized dozens of shipments by truck into Poland. … His agency received grants of $42,000 this year and an equal amount last year from the National Endowment for Democracy. …
Ted L. Kontek, a founder of the Friends of Solidarity, in Washington, said Poland’s underground press and publication network ”has forced the Government-controlled media to provide more accurate and objective information to the Polish people.” In addition, he said, ”The regime is aware that whatever it tries to hide from the people will eventually be revealed in the Solidarity press.”
Peter J. Mroczyk, president of the Solidarity Endowment, which tries to cultivate support for Solidarity in the United States … said his group had served as a conduit for money from the National Endowment for Democracy to publishing houses, youth groups, churches and political organizations.«29https://www.nytimes.com/1988/07/10/world/us-helping-polish-critics-with-funds-and-publishing.html

2. Filipini 1986

3. Nikaragva 1989

Violeta Chamorro in George H. W. Bush

4. Hong Kong / Tibet / Kitajska, od leta 1989

Proti-kitajski protestniki v Hong Kongu leta 2019 pred ameriškim konzulatom, ko je predsednik ZDA Donald Trump. V ozadju financiranja protestov sta NED in George Soros. Protestniki so zahtevali neodvisno preiskavo glede policijskega nasilja in pravico prebivalcev Hong Konga da volijo svoje voditelje.
  • Med kitajsko državno-kapitalistično skorumpirano elito in liberalnim establišmentom vlada čudna simbioza, ki jo verjetno skupaj drži predvsem neskončen pohlep in obračanje na stotine milijard $, od katerih imata ogromne koristi obe strani. Tudi glavna zasluga za gospodarski in geopolitični vzpon Kitajske gre predvsem Rockefellerju, ki je skupaj s Kissingerjem tudi najbolj zaslužen za odprtje Kitajske. Pomembno je tudi dejstvo, da je liberalni establišment (iz neznanega razloga) omogočil oz. dopustil vojaški razvoj Kitajske, kljub občasnim kritikam posameznih sredstev ’’konservativne CIA’’, ki so na to opozarjala že vsaj 20 let nazaj. Kljub temu je Kitajska občasno na udaru preko NED in Sorosa, vsaj od leta 1989 do danes. In to kljub dejstvu, da številni vodilni predstavniki establišmenta zasedajo pomembne svetovalne položaje v določenih kitajskih think tankih, inštitutih in univerzah. Vodilne osebe liberalnega establišmenta, ki so tesno povezane s Kitajsko, poleg prej omenjenih Davida Rockefellerja in Henryja Kissingerja, so še Maurice Greenberg, Hank Paulson, James Wolfensohn, John L. Thornton, Stephen Schwarzman, David Rubenstein, Henry Kravis, Robert E. Rubin, Michael Bloomberg, Timothy Geithner in Michael Spence. Poleg njih pa še Kevin Rudd, Lord Brown of Madingley, Jacob Wallenberg, vodilni predstavniki iz HSBC in Bank of England, in ostali.
  • Tiananmen Square, 1989. Udeleženi CIA elementi iz Albert Einstein Institute, ki usposabljajo kitajske študente v tehnikah ”nenasilnih protestov”.
  • Kitajski Global Times o delovanju NED na Kitajskem –

»According to Asahi Shimbun [eden od štirih največjih časopisov na Japonskem], as of 2016, NED had provided some $96.52 million to at least 103 anti-China entities, including the notorious separatist groups, such as World Uyghur Congress (WUC) and Tibetan Youth Congress (TYC). NED has provided the WUC and its affiliations with millions of dollars in funding, including $1,284,000 since 2016. This money goes to train activists and media influencers and lobby for support for Uygur separatists. In Hong Kong, NED has been in connection with several notable destabilizing forces and individuals. Reports have revealed that the NED offered over HKD13 million to the so-called Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Unions, led by Lee Cheuk-yan, to organize illegal separatist campaigns. In 2019, NED invited several notorious Hong Kong “independence” preachers for speeches, including Lee Chu-ming, who was dubbed by Ta Kung Pao as a “Hong Kong traitor” and won the NED annual prize in 2004; as did Lee Cheuk-yan and Nathan Law.«32https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202111/1239281.shtml; dostop 18.5.2023

  • Po poročanju statistika Du Jia iz Consilium Research Institute – Chongqing University, NED financira proteste, študentska gibanja in neodvisnost Hong Konga vse od leta 1994. Do leta 2018 naj bil NED za vse to investiral okoli $10 milijonov.33http://et.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/gnyw/202205/t20220507_10683090.htm V to spada tudi organiziranje, načrtovanje, financiranje in vodenje obsežni uličnih protestov od leta 2003 dalje. Leta 2019 se NED pri financiranju in organizaciji protestov v Hong Kongu pridruži še George Soros. Istega leta Soros na zasedanju od WEF imenju kitajskega predsednika za najnevarnejšega nasprotnika. Vzporedno s protesti v Hong Kongu, pa je Soros tudi financer protestov ”Sardin” v Italiji proti Matteu Salviniju (deluje kot sredstvo ”konservativne CIA”) – 

»The protests in Hong Kong have been “the most successful rebellion” so far, Soros said, adding that they offered a lesson for social movements elsewhere. “It has no visibly identifiable leadership [kar je seveda močno zavajanje] and yet it has the overwhelming support of the population.” A caveat, however, is that the Hong Kong protests may come at a “great cost” and “destroy the city’s economic prosperity,” he added.

Another social movement that was heartening, said Soros, was the youth-led “sardines” protests against Italy’s far-right leader Matteo Salvini. Late last year, thousands of Italians rapidly organized and gathered in cities across the country, packing squares tightly like the fish.«34https://qz.com/1790369/george-soros-praises-the-success-of-hong-kong-protests; dostop 19.5.2023

  • NED za proteste v Hong Kongu rekrutira proti-Kitajske elemente, da se pridružijo članom uprave od Hong Kong Democracy Council, ki ima sedež v Washingtonu. Najvidnejši član svetovalne uprave je Larry Diamond, ki je od leta 2010 član od CFR; je Senior Fellow od Hoover Institution (del ”konservativne CIA”); in ustanovni direktor (1994 – 2009) od International Forum for Democratic Studies od NED. Thomas E. Kellogg, član svetovalne uprave, je bil direktor za East Asia Program pri Sorosovi Open Society Foundations, kjer je bil zadolžen za širjenje delovanja fundacije na Kitajskem, kot tudi na Tajvanu in v Južni in Severni Koreji. Kellogg je bil pred tem raziskovalec za področje Azije pri Human Rights Watch (del ”liberalne CIA”; ključen financer Soros). Teng Biao, član svetovalne uprave, je leta 2008 dobitnik nagrade Democracy Award od NED. Sharon Hom, članica svetovalne uprave, ki je študirala kot Fulbright Scholar, 1986; bila Rockefeller Foundation Scholar pri Bellagio Center v Italiji, 2000; članica svetovalne uprave od Human Rights Watch/Asia (del ”liberalne CIA”; ključen financer Soros), 1995 – . 
  • Septembra 2021 je NED organiziral simpozij The Fight for a Democratic Future, kjer je govorec Nathan Law, član svetovalne uprave pri Hong Kong Democracy Council. Law, ki živi v izgnanstvu v Londonu, je bil leta 2014 udeleženec od Umbrella Movement. Law je leta 2021 postal Pritzker Fellow (družina Pritzker je pomemben del liberalnega establišmenta in mentorica vodilnega slovenskega sredstva ”liberalne CIA” Nike Kovač) pri Institute of Politics (William Kristol; admiral Mike Morell – CIA; Penny Pritzker) na University of Chicago. Law se leta 2020 sestane s Trumpovim ”anti-establišment” državnim sekretarjem Mikeom Pompeojem.
    • Law je bil leta 2021 govorec pri Global Progressive Forum (del ”liberalne CIA”) v Bruslju, kjer je bila govornica vodilna predstavnica liberalnega establišmenta Madeleine Albright; ter globalisti/sredstva ”liberalne CIA, kot so Federica Mogherini, Enrico Letta, Helen Clark, Tanja Fajon, Jacinda Ardern in ostali.35https://www.globalprogressiveforum.org/#speakers; dostop 19.5.2023
    • Leta 2023 je bil Law govorec pri Copenhagen Democracy Summit, kjer so bili govorci prav tako pomembni CIA predstavniki liberalnega establišmenta, njihovi evropski zavezniki in CIA sredstva, kot so Condoleezza Rice; Eric Schmidt (član od Trilateral Commission; član izvršnega odbora skupine Bilderberg; vodilni financer ”liberalne CIA”); Alex Karp (generalni direktor od CIA podjetja Palantir Technologies; član izvršnega odbora skupina Bilderberg; Peter Thiel, ključni ustanovitelj od Palantir je ključno ozadje od Trumpa); Ben Rhodes (višji svetovalec od Obama Foundation, katera je financer od Nike Kovač); Derek Mitchell (predsednik od NDI); Kimber Shearer (izvršna pod-predsednica od IRI); Hardy Merriman (predsednik od CIA-jinega International Center for Nonviolent Conflict, ki je center CIA-jinih barvnih revolucij); Jens Stoltenberg; Anders Fogh Rasmussen; Petr Pavel (Forum 2000); Nancy Pelosi; Volodymyr Zelenskyy (ukrajinsko CIA proti-rusko sredstvo); Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya (Belorusko CIA sredstvo); Kevin Casas-Zamora (generalni sekretar od International IDEA); Zhanna Nemstova (žena Borisa Nemtsova).36https://copenhagendemocracysummit.com/2023/speakers; dostop 19.5.2023 Financerji srečanja so vodilne korporacije in fundacije liberalnega establišmenta, kot so Freedom House, IRI, NDI, Schmidt Futures, George W. Bush Institute, Google, Meta/Facebook, Palantir Technologies (CIA; Peter Thiel), U.S. State Department. 37https://copenhagendemocracysummit.com/2023#sponsors; dostop 19.5.2023
  • Po navedbah kitajske ambasade v Etiopiji (poročilo izključuje Sorosa), ki navaja uradne vire od NED, je NED leta 2020 financiral 69 programov na Kitajskem v višini več kot $10 milijonov. Eden glavnih virov financiranja so organizacije, ki pozivajo k neodvisnosti pokrajine  Xinjiang oz. Vzhodni Turkestan. Tako naj bi NED med leti 2004 – 2020 zagotovil $8.7583 milijonov različnim Ujgurskim organizacijam. Dve od osrednjih organizacij financirani s strani NED sta World Uyghur Congress (WUC) in Uyghur American Association (UAA). Predsednik od NED Carl Gershman pa naj bi odprto pozival k barvni revoluciji, preko katere bi Kitajska postala zvezna republika. 38http://et.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/gnyw/202205/t20220507_10683090.htm; dostop 19.5.2023
  • NED je tudi eden od osrednjih igralcev glede ”neodvisnosti” Tibeta. Iz Tibeta prihaja tudi Dalai Lama, kot pomembno CIA sredstvo, ki je tesno povezan z nevladnimi organizacijami liberalnega establišmenta. Ena od nevladnih organizacij, ki jo je leta 1956 ustanovila CIA za podporo Dalai Lame je American Society for a Free Asia, s katero je povezana širša družina od Dalai Lame. Dalai Lama je tudi prejemnik nagrade Freedom Award, ki jo podeljuje Freedom House. Leta 2010 pa je Dalai Lama tudi prejemnik nagrade Democracy Service Medal, ki mu jo je v imenu NED podelil njen predsednik Carl Gershman, prisotna pa sta bila še Dick Gephardt in James Billington. Dalai Lama se leta 2016 udeleži tudi dogodka Hope and Democracy, ki ga je organiziral NED. Poleg Dalai Lame so bili govorci še ”aktivisti” iz Azerbajdžana, Kube, Sudana in Jordanije. Na tem dogodku leta 2016 pa je posthumni prejemnik nagrade od NED tudi tibetanski menih Tenzin Delek Rinpoche. Leta 2016 je Dalai Lama tudi gost od Baracka Obame, ki je pomembno Rockefellerjevo in Sorosovo sredstvo.
  • NED je leta 2019 financiral programe, ki so se osredotočali na neodvisnost Tibeta v višini $600,000. Leta 2020 pa $1 milijon.39http://et.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/gnyw/202205/t20220507_10683090.htm
  • NED in Open Society Foundations leta 2019/2020 skupaj financirate proteste v Hong Kongu.

5. Južna Afrika, od leta 1992

6. Bolgarija 1996

7. Romunija 1996

8. Mongolija 1996

9. Slovaška 1998 in Hrvaška 1999

10. Srbija – CANVAS 2000

11. Venezuela 2000

Guaido med proti-Maduro protestih leta 2020.

»Of particular concern is $154,377 given by the endowment to the American Center for International Labor Solidarity, the international arm of the A.F.L.-C.I.O., to assist the main Venezuelan labor union in advancing labor rights.

The Venezuelan union, the Confederation of Venezuelan Workers, led the work stoppages that galvanized the opposition to Mr. Chávez. The union’s leader, Carlos Ortega, worked closely with Pedro Carmona Estanga, the businessman who briefly took over from Mr. Chávez, in challenging the government.

The endowment also provided significant resources to the foreign policy wings of the Republican and Democratic parties for work in Venezuela, which sponsored trips to Washington by Chávez critics.

The National Democratic Institute for International Affairs was given a $210,500 grant to promote the accountability of local government. The International Republican Institute, which has an office in Venezuela, received a grant of $339,998 for political party building. On April 12, the day of the takeover, the group hailed Mr. Chávez’s ouster. “The Venezuelan people rose up to defend democracy in their country,” the institute’s president, George A. Folsom [CFR, 1999 – ], said in a statement. “Venezuelans were provoked into action as a result of systematic repression by the government of Hugo Chávez.”

The statement drew a sharp rebuke from Carl Gershman, the endowment president, for the openly political stance, which he said would undercut the institute’s work in Venezuela in the future.

The institute [IRI] has close ties to the Bush administration, which had also embraced the short-lived takeover; Lorne Craner [CFR, 1997 – ], the assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights and labor, is a former president of the organization.

In an interview, Mr. Folsom said discussions at the institute on Venezuela involved finding ways to remove Mr. Chávez by constitutional means only49https://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/25/international/americas/us-bankrolling-is-under-scrutiny-for-ties-to-chvez.html; dostop 19.5.2023

12. Haiti 2001

13. Gruzija 2003

14. Ukrajina, od leta 2004

15. Belorusija v letih 2006, 2010 in 2020

Protesti v Belorusiji leta 2020.

16. Egipt 2011

Dogajanje v Egiptu in nato padec Morsija je del CIA ”arabske pomladi”. 

17. Libija 2011

Dogajanje v Libiji je del CIA ”arabske pomladi”.

18. Tunizija 2011

Dogajanje v Tuniziji je del CIA ”arabske pomladi”.

National Endowment for Democracy in Open Society Foundations

Obe fundaciji tesno sodelujeta skupaj, čeprav se ju pogosto namerno poskuša definirati kot ideološka nasprotnika, kar pa v realnosti sploh ne drži. Soros je eden od ključnih Rockefellerjevih/CIA geopolitičnih agentov. Financiranje nevladnih organizacij, ki jih financirata NED in OSF je del skrbnega načrtovanja liberalnega establišmenta preko Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, World Economic Forum in ostalih vodilnih think tankov. Za Sorosovo Open Society Foundation je jasno, da poleg vodilnih organizacij liberalnega establišmenta financira leve in skrajno leve organizacije iz omrežja ”liberalne CIA”, tako v ZDA, kot drugje po svetu. NED deluje z OSF kot promotor ”demokracije” in ”aktivistov” na podobnih področjih, vendar izven ZDA, vključno v državnih udarih oz. ”spontanih revolucijah” bolj znanih kot barvne revolucije. Hkrati pa NED postaja vedno pomembnejši financer skrajne levice, kar je vidno tudi v Sloveniji, kjer je skupaj s Sorosom najpomembnejši financer (skrajno) levičarskih nevladnih organizacij.

»The incident shows the anti-China hysteria of the US. Both Thiel and Trump inexplicably suspect the connection between China and Google but don’t have evidence to back their allegations. To say the least, if even there was proof, there is nothing wrong with Google’s legitimate cooperation with the Chinese government83Ibid.

Thiel, ki se dela konservativca (kot del ”konservativne CIA”), je dobro zasidran med liberalno super elito okoli Rockefellerja, kjer je med drugim član izvršnega odbora od skupine Bilderberg, redni udeleženec od super elitnega in pro-globalizacijskega Sun Valley Meetings (eno od ključnih centrov promoviranja in financiranja ”liberalne CIA”), financer od Muskovega in Reidovega OpenAI, ter preko svojega visokotehnološkega vohunskega podjetja Palantir Technologies (del od CFR) tesno vpleten v delovanje od CIA in od NSA, in bil udeleženec od izredno elitne in vplivne Munich Security Conference. Njegovo nekdanje podjetje PayPal pa je tudi del od Council on Foreign Relations.

»Xinmin Evening News, a Shanghai metro paper put out by the Chinese Communist Party Shanghai Municipal Committee, published an article on July 13 asserting that American NGOs plotted recent demonstrations in Hong Kong against a controversial extradition bill. … [We] Strip Away the ‘Painted Skin’ of These American NGOs,” names the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and the Open Society Foundations (OSF) in particular as helping organize the demonstrations from behind the scenes. (“Painted skin” is a metaphorical Chinese expression describing an attractive appearance that masks an evil face and cruel nature.) Its publication comes weeks after large protests began rattling the territory. Hong Kong authorities have labeled the demonstrators as rioters. …
Citing Russian media, the article suggests that the NED has close ties with the CIA, even likening it to a “second CIA in the U.S.” “On the surface,” the article reads, “the NED is one of the two million non-governmental organizations in the United States, but senior officials of the foundation have government backgrounds or are inextricably linked to the U.S. government.” The article argues that because the NED provides funds annually to NGOs in Asia, Central and Eastern Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, and the countries of the former Soviet Union, the organization “conducts subvert activities or promotes ‘color revolutions’ in countries with which the U.S. doesn’t see eye to eye.”
The Xinmin article also discussed the Open Society Foundations, a New York-based non-profit organization founded and chaired by the Hungarian-American investor George Soros. The article claims that OSF routinely exports Western ideology and values through supposedly non-political activities and played a role in “color revolutions” that occurred in Eastern European countries in recent decades. OSF, according to Xinmin, has been actively funding activities in Hong Kong in recent years and, like the NED, is focused on infiltrating the region’s universities.«84https://www.chinafile.com/ngo/latest/shanghai-newspaper-accuses-american-ngos-of-supporting-hong-kong-protests

»£500,000 – £999,999: Department for International Development, UK … Foreign & Commonwealth Office, UK … Robert Bosch Stiftung [”liberalna CIA”] … £250,000 – £499,999: Chevron Ltd . [del CFR] … Children’s Investment Fund Foundation [”liberalna CIA”; top financer od Extinction Rebellion] … John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation [”liberalna CIA”]… Open Society Foundations [”liberalna CIA”] … Royal Dutch Shell … £100,000 – £249,999: AIG [del CFR] … Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [”liberalna CIA”] … BP plc [del CFR] … Carnegie Corporation of New York [”liberalna CIA”] … European Commission … ExxonMobil Corporation [del CFR] … ExxonMobil Foundation … EY [del CFR; del ”liberalne CIA”] … Koç Holding [Ali Y. Koç – član globalne uprave od CFR] … Korea Foundation … MAVA Foundation [”liberalna CIA”] … Stavros Niarchos Foundation [”liberalna CIA”] … £50,000 – £99,999: Aga Khan Foundation [”liberalna CIA”] … Barclays … HSBC Holdings … Humanity United [”liberalna CIA”; Omidyar Network]… IKEA Foundation [”liberalna CIA”] … Internet Society [”liberalna CIA”] … Konrad Adenauer Stiftung [”liberalna CIA”] … Lockheed Martin UK [del CFR] … McKinsey & Company [del CFR; ”liberalna CIA”]… Mo Ibrahim Foundation [Mo Ibrahim – član globalne uprave od CFR; ”liberalna CIA”]… S&P Global [del CFR] … Sandia National Laboratories … Santander … £25,000 – £49,000: Anglo American plc … BHP … British Army … Clifford Chance LLP … Credit Suisse [del CFR] DeepMind Ethics & Society [Google; CIA] … Eni S.p.A. [del CFR] … European Bank for Reconstruction and Development … Huawei Technologies … JP Morgan Securities Plc [del CFR] … KPMG LLP [”liberalna CIA”] … Leonardo S.p.A. … National Endowment for Democracy [”liberalna CIA”] … Rio Tinto Ltd … Rockefeller Foundation [”liberalna CIA”] … Skoll Global Threats Fund [”liberalna CIA”] … Standard Chartered Bank [del CFR] … Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency … World Health Organisation … £10,000 – £24,999: BAE Systems plc … Bank of America Merrill Lynch [del CFR] … Bayer AG … BBC … BlackRock [del CFR] … BNP Paribas … China International Capital Corporation … Citi [del CFR] … City of London … David and Lucile Packard Foundation [”liberalna CIA”] … Deloitte [del CFR] … Henry Luce Foundation [”liberalna CIA”] … Honeywell International … LetterOne … Lloyds Bank … MetLife [del CFR] … Microsoft Limited [del CFR] … Moody’s Invetors Service Limited [del CFR] … Morgan Stanley [del CFR] … NATO Defense CollegePew Charitable Trusts [”liberalna CIA”] … Saudi Petroleum Overseas Ltd … Smith Richardson Foundation [”konservativna CIA”]… Société Générale … Stephen Brenninkmeijer … The Economist … £3,000 – £9,999: Alexander Soros [”liberalna CIA”] … Amnesty International [”liberalna CIA”] … Apple … Baker & McKenzie LLP … Bank of England … Bloomberg [del CFR; ”liberalna CIA”] … Brown Brothers Harriman … CBS News … Debevoise & Plimpton LLP … Google [del CFR]… K2 IntelligenceOxfam [”liberalna CIA”] … Ploughshares Fund [”liberalna CIA”] … Qatar Foundation … Rabobank International … Save the Children [”liberalna CIA”] … Shearman & Sterling LLP … Sullivan & Cromwell [del CFR] … Tata Ltd … Telegraph Media Group … The Guardian [”liberalna CIA”] … UBS … £0 – £2,999: Energy Intelligence Group [del od CFR] … European Endowment for Democracy … Rotary International … The Elders Foundation«88https://www.chathamhouse.org/about/our-funding/donors-chatham-house; dostop 6.7.2020

»Andrew W. Mellon FoundationAnnie E. Casey Foundation … Democracy Fund … Facebook … Google News Initiative … John S. and James L. Knight FoundationLumina Foundation [Omidyar Network] … [John D. & Catherine T.] MacArthur Foundation … McClatchy Foundation … Miami Foundation … National Endowment for Democracy … Newmark Philanthropies … Omidyar Network | Luminate … Open Society FoundationsRita Allen Foundation … Robert R. McCormick Foundation … Silicon Valley Community FoundationTides Foundation (Google.org)«90https://www.poynter.org/major-funders/; 7.10.2020

»This conference was cosponsored by the International Forum for Democratic Studies at the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and Foreign Policy at Brookings, which is grateful for the generous support it received for this project from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the Open Society Foundations.«92https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/06_human_rights_piccone.pdf; str. 1

»Bertelsmann Stiftung [Sun Valley Meetings; ”liberalna CIA”] … Dutch Jewish Humanitarian Fund … Friedrich Ebert Stiftung … Heinrich Böll Stiftung … International Visegrad Fund … King Baudouin FoundationNational Endowment for Democracy … Norway Civic Grants … Open Society Foundations … Most important international professional partners: … Atlantic CouncilBrookings Institute … Carnegie Europe … Central European University [Soros] … Chatham House [Royal Institute of International Affairs] … CSIS [Center for Strategic and International Studies]… European Policy Centre … Globsec Policy Institute … Human Rights First … Institute for Strategic DialogueInternational Republican Institute … Munk School of Global Affairs – University of Toronto … National Democratic Institute … Visegrad Insight«https://politicalcapital.hu/our_partners.php; dostop 26.7.2020

»Our past and present major donors include: … European Commission … Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, U.K. … National Endowment for DemocracyOpen Society Foundations … Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency … United States Department of State«93https://www.rights-practice.org/how-were-funded; dostop 8.3.2022

»DONORS … Open Society Foundations – Armenia … National Endowment for DemocracyEuropean CommissionOpen Society Foundations – Budapest … Transparency international Secretariat … US Agency for International Development … Eurasia Partnership Foundation … Oxfam Great Britain Armenian Branch Office … Oxfam Netherlands (Novib) … Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation … UN Environment Programme … European Endowment for Democracy«94https://transparency.am/en/about/donors

»1) Donors … Starting up June 2004: Rockefeller Foundation, 200,000 THB [po izračunu tečaja dolarja 26.7.2020. – 6,324.07 $] … Year 2, 2005-2006: … Open Society Foundation, 50,000 USD … Open Society Foundation, 46,800 USD … Year 3, 2006-2007 … Open Society Foundation, 52,000 USD … Year 4, 2007-2008: … Fund for Global Human Rights (FGHR), 10,000 USD … Open Society Foundation, 60,000 USD … Year 6, 2009-2010: … National Endowment for Democracy (NED), 50,000 USD … Year 7, 2010-2011: … Fund for Global Human Rights (FGHR), 10,000 USD … National Endowment for Democracy (NED), 50,000 USD … Open Society Foundation (Media Program), 60,000 USD … Year 8, 2011-2012: … National Endowment for Democracy (NED), 50,000 USD … 2) Projects/Services: … Year 2007-2009 Heinrich Böll Foundation … 599,200 THB [po izračunu tečaja dolarja 26.7.2020. – 18,946.93 $]«95https://prachatai.com/english/about/prachatai

Alliance for Global Justice

V tej igri dezinformacij, umetnega igranja vlog in ”pranja možganov”, igrajo pomembno vlogo nevladne organizacije ”liberalne CIA”, kamor spada nevladna antifa (pro-komunistična, socialistična) organizacija Alliance for Global Justice. Alliance for Global Justice v tej (CIA) igri vlog igra nasprotnika neokonservativcev in konservativcev, kot tudi nasprotnika liberalne super elite, vključno z Madeleine Albright in Hillary Clinton.

»What is NED? … “Democracy building” is one of the core beliefs of neoconservatives. But what they call democracy and what most people think of as democracy bear very little resemblance to each other. Neoconservatives are obsessed to maintaining and expanding US power. It is about realizing their vision of a “New American Century.” This is incompatible with real democracy in which the people of the world’s sovereign nations exercise their self-determination. … the neocons need programs that will insure that other people will vote the “right” way. Thus, US democracy building programs are actually anti-democratic programs aimed at distorting and manipulating foreign elections to support US hegemony.The best known agency of democracy building is the National Endowment for Democracy, a supposedly private organization that operates almost 100% with our tax money. … The National Endowment for Democracy is made up of four core groups The International Republican Institute and the National Democratic Institute are affiliated with the two political parties. Sen. John McCain is chair of the IRI and Clinton Secretary of State Madeline Albright chairs the NDI. The AFL-CIO has its own affiliate, the American Center for International Labor Solidarity also known as the Solidarity Center and to round out the engines of empire, the Chamber of Commerce has its affiliate the Center for International Private Enterprise. To further confuse things, the NED operates its own grants and also makes grants to its sub-groups which they then give out under their own names. If you are confused, we can assume that they intend for us to be confused. That’s also why they call their electoral manipulation projects “democracy building” when they are actually just the opposite. NED’s first success was to defeat the Sandinista government in Nicaragua in 1990. … The National Democratic Institute specializes in polling and quick counts. It’s blatantly manipulated poll in the Venezuela recall election of 2004 claimed Chavez lost when he actually won with 60%. It’s quick count in the Ukraine in 2003 cast doubt on the socialist victory and spawned the so-called Orange Revolution. They were apparently hoping the same thing would happen in Venezuela as a result of their phony poll. NDI’s pollster is none other than Mark Penn who was the top strategist in Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. The AFL-CIO’s Solidarity Center [del ”liberalne CIA”], another core group of the NED, funded the anti-Chavez labor federation whose leader, Carlos Ortega, was one of the leaders of the 2002 coup.«96https://afgj.org/what-is-ned

Ko pogledamo financerje od Alliance for Global Justice, ugotovimo, da so financirani s strani ”liberalne CIA” –

»Amnesty International USA 20,000[$ 2016] … Tides Foundation 143,000 [$ 2016] 50,000 [$ 2017] … Wallace Global Fund 50,000 [$ 2016] 10,000 [$ 2017] … Ben & Jerry Foundation [ozadje od Bernieja Sandersa] 10,000 [$ 2016] 20,000 [$ 2017]«97https://www.ngo-monitor.org/funder/alliance-for-global-justice/

Tides Foundation deluje kot klirinška hiša od Rockefellerjev, Sorosa, Gatesa, Buffeta in ostalih iz omrežja”liberalne CIA” za financiranje obskurnih nevladnih organizacij, in levičarskih organizacij, kot je Alliance for Global Justice.

Ostali super elitni financerji in pomembni financerji od Alliance for Global Justice, v različnih časovnih obdobjih iz ”liberalne CIA” so –

Alliance for Global Justice je partnerska organizacija od izraelsko/palestinske Coalition of Woman for Peace, katere partnerji so še ostali iz omrežja ”liberalne CIA” – Oxfam Novib, Samuel Rubin Foundation, The European Commission (Evropska komisija je samo ”območna” pisarna Rockefellerjevega liberalnega establišmenta), Rosa Luxemburg Foundation [fundacija nemške skrajno leve stranke Links; močno vpeta v omrežje ”liberalne CIA”; tesno povezana s slovensko stranko Levica], Bread for the World.101https://coalitionofwomen.org/page/3

Alliance for Global Justice, pa je tako kot ostale nevladne organizacije, v glavnem levičarske in iz kroga ”liberalne CIA”, financirala Occupy Wall Street v višini 206,000$.102https://matthewvadum.com/2011/11/occupy-wall-street-and-soros/ Occupy Wall Street je popolnoma pod kontrolo fundacij in ljudi iz Rockefellerjevega in Sorosovega kroga, kot so to Joseph Stiglitz (svetovalec Bernieja Sandersa), Jeffrey Sachs (svetovalec Bernieja Sandersa), Naomi Klien, Michael Moore, Norman Lear, Bernie Sanders in Barack Obama.

»Occupy Wall Street is too young and informal to have received nonprofit status, so some of its donations are collected by the Alliance for Global Justice, a charity that has a long history of serving as a fiscal sponsor of progressive grass-roots groups.«103https://www.philanthropy.com/article/Occupy-Wall-Street-Raises-More/157587

Poleg tega pa Alliance for Global Justice z vlogo, ki jo umetno igra na tem geopolitičnem parketu, tudi pro-Palestinska, kar je jasna ideologija ”liberalne CIA”, če izvzamemo elitne zionistične pro-Izraelske, neokonservativne, vohunske in dezinformativne (Mossad, CIA) nevladne organizacije, kot je Anti-Defamation League in podobne.

Alliance for Global Justice je sestavljena s strani podpornikov Sandističnega omrežja v Nikaragvi. Temu primerno organizacija podpira še ostale levičarske vlade, kot je to Madurova v Venezueli, podpirajo Daniela Ortego v Nikaragvi, Raula Castra na Kubi. Med ekstremisti, ki jih podpira Alliance for Global Justice, kot tudi nekateri iz omrežja ”liberalne CIA”, je tudi Mumia Abu-Jamal iz Black Panther, ki je ubil dva policista; kot tudi Black Liberation Army; in teroristično skupino Weather Underground; itd.

Hkrati z Alliance for Global Justice, pa Open Society Foundations v Nikaragvi financira tudi proti-Sandistično Nicaraguan Association for Human Rights (ANPDH). Financer od ANPDH tudi National Endowment for Democracy in National Democratic Institute. ANPDH je bila ustanovljena leta 1986 pod predsednikom Reaganom (top sredstvo ”konservativne CIA”), da bi počistila za vojno, ki jo je Reaganova vlada preko CIA vodila v Nikaragvi. Organizacija je leta 1987 dobila $3 milijone od kongresa, z namenom, da bi izboljšala podobo človekovih pravic od CIA podprtih Contrasov, medtem, ko so se povsem osredotočali na zlorabe s strani pro-komunističnih Sandistov. ANPDH je začel dobivati večja sredstva s strani ameriške vlade (Trump) tudi leta 2018, z namenom odstranitve predsednika Ortege.

»Gustavo Bermúdez, a member of ANDPH’s board, said that among the $443,876 received by Leiva was $45,000 in 2017 and $60,000 in April 2018 from the US government’s National Endowment for Democracy. He reaped an additional $28,876 in 2017 from the US government’s National Democratic Institute and $310,000 from the Open Society Foundations of anti-communist billionaire George Soros between 2017 and 2019104https://thegrayzone.com/2019/07/30/nicaraguan-human-rights-director-accused-by-staff-of-massive-theft-of-us-taxpayer-money-death-toll-inflation/

Chavez, Telesur, Rockefellerji, Soros in National Endowment for Democracy

TeleSur, ki je del južno-ameriškega socialističnega televizijskega omrežja, katero zajema Venezuelo, Kubo in Nikaragvo in naj bi bil Chavezov ”odgovor” na ameriški CNN (Sun Valley Meetings), kateri je del liberalnega establišmenta, kot tudi podpornik ideologije ”liberalne CIA”, tako pravi o NED in njegovem vpletanju v Južno Ameriko, predvsem v Venezuelo, Nikaragvo in Kubo –

»The CIA’s influence in Latin America is not a “leftist rant”, it is ever-present and ignoring it represents a real menace for national sovereignty and the continuity of progressive governments in the region. In 2018, one of its offshoots, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) channeled over US$23 million to meddle in the internal affairs of key Latin American countries, under the flagship of “human rights”, “democracy” and “entrepreneurship. … Congressman Dante Fascell (D, FL) [CFR, 1973-1998], a later co-founder of NED, introduced a bill in April 1967 to create the Institute of International Affairs, an initiative that would authorize overt funding for what the U.S. referred to as exporting “democracy”, but it didn’t go through. However, the 1970s would force a change inside the CIA, and subsequently the world. … With money from the Agency of International Development (USAID), a government program recommended the establishment of a bipartisan, non-profit corporation to be known as the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). By 1983, the new organization was created, and the CIA had a new way to channel funds for countries who did not agree with U.S policy. … In 2018, US$2.4 million were destined for Venezuela. However, it is the only country in the region in which the recipients are not published. The programs are described under civic education, human rights observatories, and vague liberal keywords such as empowerment, freedom, democracy and democratic values.
Yet journalists, Max Blumenthal and Dan Cohen wrote in January 2019 an extensive investigative piece that explained how opposition lawmaker Juan Guaido [sredstvo liberalnega establišmenta], who has declared himself interim president in Venezuela with teh support of teh U.S. and its allies, is a product of NED’s funding.
On October 5, 2005, five Venezuelan “student leaders” arrived in Serbia to begin training for an insurrection, courtesy of the NED-funded Center for Applied Non-Violent Action and Strategies (Canvas). According to leaked internal emails from intelligence firm Stratfor, Canvas “may have also received CIA funding and training during the 1999/2000 anti-Milosevic struggle.”
It was two years later, in 2007, when Guaido graduated from University that he moved to Washington, DC to enroll in the Governance and Political Management Program at George Washington University, under the tutelage of neoliberal Venezuelan economist Luis Enrique Berrizbeitia [IMF; COP22; Sustainable Inovation Forum 2014; Climate Policy Initiative 2017]. The “Generation 2007” class was created, with others such as Yon Goicoechea [Milton Friedman Prize for Advancing Liberty – CATO Institute; World Economic Forum] and David Smolansky [Americas Society/Council of the Americas; Concordia Summit].” …
In a 2010 report by the Spanish think tank, Fride Institute, with funding from the World Movement for Democracy (a NED project), disclosed that the Venezuelan opposition was receiving funding of whopping US$40 to 50 million annually, which shows that NED funding is just one of the strategies to funnel clandestine ops.
By 2014, the same “student leaders” would create the guarimbas, a student-led anti-government movement that has been accused of violence, to exacerbate chaos and a few years later Guaido would become the latest pawn in the U.S. interventionist plot in Venezuela

Ta južno-ameriška socialistična struja, ki jo predstavljajo Chavez, Maduro, Castro, Ortega, kot tudi njihov TeleSur, ki deluje kot ”proti-ameriška opozicija”, pa je tesno povezana s posameznimi top predstavniki ”liberalne CIA”. Tudi ideološko se ta socialistična naveza odlično vklopi v samo ”liberalno CIA”. Ti elitni posamezniki iz Hollywooda so –

Takšne povezave teh raznih socialistov, antife, ”anti-rasistov” in ”anti-imperialistov”, kot so Chavez, Maduro, Castro itd., z ljudmi, ki so del Rockefellerjeve, Sorosove naveze, pove dovolj samo po sebi, kdo v resnici so (bili). In ni naključje, da se družijo s točno določenimi predstavniki te ”liberalne CIA” struje. In po zelo podobnem načinu deluje celoten sistem, od Grete Thunberg do Donalda Trumpa.


Viri –